0315 - UFOs & Nukes - Russia
Eyewitnesses say that they saw an UFO hovering above the exploded reactor
Sixteen years have passed since the disaster at the Chernobyl nuclear plant on April 26, 1986. The explosion happened at 1:23 a.m. Tons of radioactive products were emitted into the atmosphere. The machine shop of the plant was gripped with fire, and the fire was about to move on to the third power-generating unit of the plant. Firemen managed to extinguish the fire several hours later. Many of them died later of radiation exposure.
Much has been written about the Chernobyl disaster, both in Russia and abroad. It seems that the physical nature of the tragedy has determined, as well as the people who were responsible for it. The fourth power-generating unit was supposed to be repaired. Yet, before shutting it down, the administration of the plant decided to perform several experiments. Steam delivery was cut to one of the turbogenerators in order to discover the period of time that electric power would still be generated due to the rotation of the rotor. The experiment was not well-organized. There was another test conducted simultaneously: the study of turbine vibration.
They started decreasing the capacity of the generating unit at 1 a.m. on April 25. The emergency cooling system of the reactor was shut down at 2 p.m. This was supposed to stop the reactor.
However, the Kievenergo energy company did not know anything about these tests. An energy control officer did not allow the fourth generating unit of the plant to be stopped. These were the prerequisites of the tragedy. Many people are still suffering.
The explosion was very large, but, luckily, it was a thermal blast. The fourth power generating unit was basically destroyed by overheated steam. There was no nuclear explosion. Roughly 180 tons of enriched uranium were in the reactor. If a large blast had happened, half of Europe would not currently be depicted on any maps.
There are many theories to explain such luck. One of the theories is that there was help from an Unidentified Flying Object. When troublesome events started to occur, some people saw a spaceship hovering above the fourth generating unit of the Chernobyl plant. Eyewitnesses say that an UFO was there for six hours and that hundreds of people saw it. People started writing about it only two years after the catastrophe. Of course, such information appeared in magazines on ufology. As it is generally believed, serious people don’t read such magazines and journals.
Here is what Mikhail Varitsky had to say: “I and other people from my team went to the site of the blast at night. We saw a ball of fire, and it was slowly flying in the sky. I think the ball was six or eight meters in diameter. Then, we saw two rays of crimson light stretching towards the fourth unit. The object was some 300 meters from the reactor. The event lasted for about three minutes. The lights of the object went out and it flew away in the northwestern direction.”
The UFO brought the radiation level down. The level was decreased almost four times. This probably prevented a nuclear blast.
Three years later (on September 16, 1989), the fourth power-generating unit emitted radiation into the atmosphere. Several hours later, a doctor saw an object in the sky above the Chernobyl plant. Doctor Gospina described it as “amber-like.” She said she could see the top and the bottom of it as well.
In October of 1990, a reporter from the newspaper the Echo of Chernobyl , V. Navran, was photographing the machine shop of the Chernobyl plant. “I photographed the top of it, includomg a part of the hole above. I remember everything very well; I did not see any UFO. However, when I developed the film, I clearly saw an object that was hovering above the hole in the roof.” The object looked like the one doctor Gospina saw.
It seems that aliens are not worried with the fate of humanity. They are basically worried about the planets environment.
Translated by Dmitry Sudakov
Il n’est pas normal que nous soyons encore vivants. Nous, les Européens. C’est même carrément un miracle, d’après le Pr Georges Lochak1. Cet éminent physicien français, président de la Fondation Louis-de-Broglie, est l’un des experts qui a le plus étudié l’origine, la nature, le déroulement et les conséquences de la catastrophe de Tchernobyl, le 26 avril 1996. Rappelons qu’il ne s’est agi « que » d’une explosion thermique ayant produit le fameux nuage radioactif, suite à une apparente série de cafouillages humains liés à la maintenance du site. La plus grande partie de l’Europe aurait été rayée de la carte s’il s’était agi d’une explosion nucléaire à l’intérieur du réacteur. Or celui-ci contenait cent quatre-vingts tonnes d’uranium enrichi – et, pour le Pr Lochak, il est impossible, dans les conditions où s’est déroulée la catastrophe, que cette explosion nucléaire n’ait pas eu lieu. A moins d’admettre une explication scientifique fondée sur un phénomène pas vraiment rationnel que Lochak a constaté, il n’en démord pas. Ni ses collègues physiciens russes de l’Institut Kourtchatov (le plus grand centre de recherche nucléaire de Russie), cosignataires avec lui du rapport d’expertise du site. Leurs découvertes, leurs réfutations de la thèse officielle et leurs conclusions sont plutôt renversantes.
Tout part d’une situation désormais certaine à leurs yeux, à l’issue de l’enquête : il n’y a pas eu une explosion, mais deux. La première, trente secondes avant celle due à la surchauffe de vapeur, a été entendue par tout le monde à des kilomètres à la ronde, mais « retirée » des premiers rapports d’enquête officiels.
« Cette première explosion n’était pas de nature nucléaire, écrivent Lochak et ses collègues, mais elle fut d’une violence extrême, enfonçant des portes blindées d’une épaisseur de cinq centimètres. Or la cause de cet accident, qui a précédé la catastrophe et ne saurait lui être imputé, n’a pas reçu d’explication2. »
Certains l’ont, cette explication. Ils sont plus d’une centaine de témoins ayant vu, selon le quotidien russe Pravda, un gigantesque ovni en vol stationnaire durant six heures au-dessus du réacteur3. Un ovni qui, avant même l’accident, aurait « ouvert » par cette première explosion le réacteur nucléaire et « travaillé » à sa neutralisation – mais de quelle manière ?
Lochak et ses collègues russes ne mentionnent pas dans leur rapport le mot « ovni ». Ils parlent de « rayonnement étrange flottant au-dessus du réacteur ». L’intéressant est qu’ils ne spéculent pas sur la nature dudit rayonnement, mais qu’ils expliquent techniquement en quoi ce phénomène est lié au « miracle » de Tchernobyl : la disparition quasi totale du combustible nucléaire avant qu’il ne soit susceptible d’exploser. Lisons la suite de leur rapport.
« La paroi latérale du réacteur nucléaire a parfaitement résisté à l’explosion. L’intérieur a été exploré grâce à un périscope introduit par une ouverture forée dans la paroi, et nous avons découvert que cet intérieur était vide ! […] La face interne du réacteur a été trouvée étonnamment indemne. La peinture était restée intacte. Or on a pris soin de vérifier qu’elle ne résistait pas à une température supérieure à 300 °C. Ces faits auraient dû attirer l’attention. […] Malgré cet apparent état normal, une force énorme, qui n’a pas ébranlé les parois du réacteur, a soulevé de dix mètres son “couvercle” en béton de 3 mètres d’épaisseur et pesant 2 000 tonnes, qui a basculé sur le côté. »
Et le plus incroyable nous est assené avec un style d’une neutralité parfaite, que conservera Lochak lorsqu’il confirmera ses propos dans un ouvrage collectif de vulgarisation4 : « Ce que l’on sait, même si cela n’a jamais été dévoilé au grand jour, c’est que des transmutations se sont produites au sein du réacteur au moment de l’accident. Par exemple, on y a trouvé une dizaine de tonnes d’aluminium, métal qui est totalement étranger à la construction d’un réacteur. »
Vous avez bien lu. Des transmutations, comme au temps des alchimistes, quand Nicolas Flamel et ses émules tentaient de changer le plomb en or. Précisons d’emblée qu’il est rigoureusement impossible, en physique, d’obtenir de l’aluminium à partir d’uranium enrichi.
Que s’est-il passé, alors ? Comment cet aluminium s’est-il retrouvé là, et comment 90 % du combustible nucléaire s’est-il évaporé ? Réponse de nos quatre experts : « Le rayonnement étrange qui flottait au-dessus du réacteur transportait des monopôles magnétiques5. » Nous voilà bien avancés. De quoi s’agit-il, d’un rayon magique pompant l’uranium et le transmutant ? Pas tout à fait. On appelle « monopôles magnétiques » des particules hypothétiques qui seraient porteuses d’une seule charge magnétique ponctuelle, à la différence des aimants qui possèdent deux pôles magnétiques opposés. Georges Lochak, à la suite de Paul Dirac et Louis de Broglie, en est aujourd’hui le plus grand spécialiste international, pour ne pas dire le seul.
Vulgairement parlant, si l’on associe la théorie de ces physiciens, leur description de l’état intérieur du réacteur nucléaire et les observations extérieures d’ovni, on en arrive à l’hypothèse suivante : le « rayonnement étrange » a volatilisé près de cent quatre-vingts tonnes d’uranium enrichi en le transformant en aluminium inoffensif, et ce afin d’éviter une explosion nucléaire qui aurait anéanti l’Europe. C’est du moins la conclusion que certains sites ont publiée, brut de décoffrage, en rendant grâce aux extraterrestres pour leur intervention6.
Cette conclusion se fonde sur les travaux du Pr Lochak et de ses collègues russes, mais aussi sur les déclarations de témoins oculaires comme celle de Mikhaïl Varitsky dans la Pravda : « Quand mon équipe et moi sommes arrivés sur les lieux de l’explosion, nous avons vu une boule de feu de six à huit mètres de diamètre qui évoluait lentement dans le ciel. Deux rayons de lumière pourpre s’allongèrent vers le réacteur. Tout cela dura environ trois minutes. Ensuite, les lumières de l’objet s’éteignirent, et il s’éloigna en direction du nord-ouest7. » Et le journaliste de la Pravda conclut : « Cela a probablement empêché la catastrophe nucléaire. » Et voilà.
Comparé aux autres dossiers de ce type que j’ai étudiés (voir : Bombe [les ovnis n’aiment pas trop la]), celui-ci paraît à la fois le plus commenté par les scientifiques et le moins riche en témoignages militaires – alors que l’état-major russe, on l’a vu notamment dans le rapport COMETA, est plutôt enclin, d’habitude, à la reconnaissance officielle de phénomènes ovni. Gageons que, en l’occurrence, ce silence est moins dû à un éventuel sauvetage de nature extraterrestre qu’aux négligences humaines qui paraissent à l’origine de la catastrophe.
Cela étant, une lecture attentive du rapport (très complexe) de Georges Lochak m’oblige à dire qu’il ne soutient pas du tout la thèse d’une intervention extraterrestre, mais d’une explosion initiale dans la salle des machines de la centrale ayant dégagé, d’après lui, ces fameux monopôles magnétiques, concept dont il détient aujourd’hui la quasi-exclusivité – pour ne pas dire le monopole, comme l’ont fait, sans se priver du jeu de mots, ses adversaires qui l’accusent de vouloir « placer son produit ». Le « rayonnement étrange » dont il parle dans son texte peut se rapporter à une simple émission lumineuse des neutrinos entrant dans la composition de ses monopôles, si j’ai bien suivi.
Affaire classée, alors ? Pas vraiment. Il reste quand même les photos de ce cigare lumineux au-dessus de la centrale. Personne ne nous a encore dit qu’un farceur l’avait fabriqué dans sa cuisine, comme ce fut le cas lors de la vague de soucoupes en Belgique.
Et puis, il y a eu Fukushima, en avril 2012. Rebelote : un hélicoptère de la télévision japonaise a longuement filmé un ovni en vol stationnaire au-dessus de la centrale, durant la catastrophe qui aurait pu détruire le Japon. Compte tenu de la quantité de combustible nucléaire présent dans le réacteur, l’accident de Fukushima aurait dû être trois cents fois plus dévastateur que celui de Tchernobyl. Tous les experts s’accordent à dire que 99 % des conséquences logiques de cette catastrophe n’ont pas eu lieu.
Que s’est-il passé, alors ? A-t-on retrouvé une fois encore dans le réacteur de l’aluminium en lieu et place de l’uranium 235 ? Aucune réponse officielle du Japon. Chape de plomb. C’est le ministère de la Défense chinois, en « bon copain », qui a mis en ligne sur Internet les vidéos de l’ovni salvateur. Le Japon a répondu que « ce n’était pas forcément un ovni ». La piste d’un dirigeable a été évoquée par les sceptiques. Même celle d’un TGV, soulevé de ses rails par le tsunami. Regardez les images sur You-Tube ou Dailymotion, et comparez avec celles de Tchernobyl. Et avec celles des incidents nucléaires plus anciens dont j’ai parlé précédemment (voir : Bombe [les ovnis n’aiment pas trop la]). La seule différence, me semble-t-il, c’est que cette fois on n’a pas parlé de ballons-sondes. Il faut bien évoluer un peu. C’est une bonne piste, le TGV.
Que dire en conclusion ? Dans le doute, face à ces accidents nucléaires qui, chaque fois, auraient dû détruire des millions de vies humaines et n’ont causé « que » quelques milliers de morts et de cancers, remercions qui nous voulons, mais surtout essayons d’en tirer les conséquences. Et si les ovnis, comme le croient certains, ne sont que le produit réel de l’inconscient collectif qui matérialise ses angoisses ou son besoin de protection, alors là aussi il y a une leçon à méditer, et une remise en cause de nos structures énergétiques dont nous ne pouvons plus faire l’économie. Que l’origine de ces catastrophes soit humaine, mécanique ou imputable à la météo, ça ne change rien aux conséquences.
Cela dit, à ma connaissance, les autorités japonaises n’ont pas demandé au Pr Lochak d’aller expertiser Fukushima. On ne sait donc pas si, une fois encore, ce sont les monopôles magnétiques qui ont fait le coup.
Références
1. Georges Lochak, Défense et illustration de la science. Le savant, la science et l’ombre, Ellipses, 2002.
2. D. Filippov, G. Lochak, A. Rukhadze, L. Urutskoiev, Une nouvelle hypothèse sur l’origine de la catastrophe de Tchernobyl, 2003, www.lochak.com/
3. Pravda, 16 septembre 2002, www.english.pravda.ru/
4. G. Grandazzi, G. Ackerman, F. Lemarchand, Les Silences de Tchernobyl. L’avenir contaminé, Autrement, 2006.
5. D. Filippov, G. Lochak, A. Rukhadze, L. Urutskoiev, Une nouvelle hypothèse…, op. cit.
7. Pravda, 16 septembre 2002, art. cit.
Une Nouvelle Hypothèse sur l’Origine de la Catastrophe Tchernobyl
D. Filippov1 , G. Lochak, A. Rukhadze2 , L. Urutskoiev3 1.
Introduction
L’explication d’un événement aussi complexe que la catastrophe de Tchernobyl reste toujours hypothétique car le phénomène n’est évidemment pas reproductible, du moins on l’espère, et ne se prête donc pas à une vérification scientifique d’ensemble. Le rapport officiel sur la catastrophe offre une explication, généralement admise ; mais après longues réflexions, il nous est apparu que la description proposée comporte des lacunes qu’il n’est possible de combler qu’à partir de nouvelles hypothèses physiques.
Le présent article est le résumé, sans calculs, de travaux dus à trois d’entre nous (Filippov, Rukhadze et Urutskoiev), le quatrième (Lochak) est ici en tant qu’auteur de la théorie du monopôle magnétique leptonique sur lequel repose l’hypothèse qui sera suggérée pour expliquer la catastrophe4 . Le rapport officiel omet une série de faits importants:
• Tout d’abord, il n’y a pas eu une explosion mais deux, à peu d’intervalle, la première plus sourde, mais déjà puissante, entendue à des kilomètres, la suivante énorme, c’est celle qui s’est produite dans le réacteur, lieu de la catastrophe. Les témoins rapprochés disent qu’elle s’est produite quelques secondes plus tard ; des témoins éloignés disent : quelques dizaines de secondes. Ce temps n’a pas été enregistré. Selon le personnel en place près du réacteur, la première explosion s’est produite à l’extérieur « avec un fracas terrible », dans la salle des machines, une gigantesque salle où se trouvent les turbines et les générateurs de courant alternatif. Cette première explosion n’était pas de nature nucléaire, mais elle fut d’une violence extrême. A.S. Diatlov, Vice-Ingénieur en Chef de la centrale, a écrit un livre dans lequel il dit qu’ « il faudrait la plume de Dante pour décrire l’état de la salle des machines ». Certains ont dit modestement que l’explosion avait « enfoncé des portes », mais en omettant de préciser qu’elles étaient blindées et d’une épaisseur de plusieurs centimètres. Or la cause de cet accident, qui a précédé la catastrophe et ne saurait lui être imputé, n’a pas reçu d’explication.
• Lors de cette explosion, dans la salle des machines, un autre fait étrange et violent s’est produit. Par endroits, la tuyauterie de conduite de vapeur, qui assure la circulation du liquide de refroidissement entre le réacteur et l’un des turbo- 1 RECOM, Institut Kurchatov, Moscou. 2 Institut de Physique Générale, Académie des Sciences de Russie, Moscou 3 RECOM, Institut Kurchatov, Moscou 4 « Fusion » (N° 93, Nov.-Déc. 2002) a publié des articles sur les expériences de transmutation à basse énergie du groupe d’Urutskoiev, dont il sera question plus loin, ainsi que sur le monopôle leptonique de Lochak. - 2 - alternateurs, passait au voisinage de cables électriques fixés au mur. Ces cables ont arraché leur fixation, brisé les protections qui les entouraient et se sont violemment précipités contre la conduite de vapeur. Quelle force les a attirés ? La question n’a pas été posée.
• La paroi latérale du réacteur a parfaitement résisté à l’explosion. L’intérieur a été exploré grâce à un périscope introduit par une ouverture forée dans la paroi et on a découvert que cet intérieur était vide ! Ce qui signifie qu’une partie importante du combustible nucléaire avait disparu. Or ces dizaines de tonnes d’uranium ne pouvaient passer inaperçues, ni à l’intérieur ni à l’extérieur, et elles n’ont certainement pas été volées dans l’enfer de la catastrophe. Alors que sont-elles devenues ? Le fond du réacteur s’étant effondré, on a d’abord cru que le combustible était mêlé à une sorte de magma de terre, mais c’était faux : le compte n’y était pas et de loin.
• La face interne du réacteur a été trouvée étonnamment indemne. La peinture était restée intacte. Or on a pris soin de vérifier qu’elle ne résistait pas à une température supérieure à 300° C ; on a même retrouvé des marques au crayon tracées pendant la construction. Ces faits auraient dû attirer l’attention car ils soulèvent la question des interactions nucléaires qui ont agi pendant la catastrophe : si cela avait été des interactions fortes, qui agissent généralement entre les particules lourdes comme les protons et les neutrons, la température eût été beaucoup plus élevée et les dégâts plus grands. Notons qu’il y avait également très peu de traces de suie et seulement dans le secteur sud-est du réacteur, ce qui semble écarter l’hypothèse qu’un incendie se serait déclaré, comme on l’a avancé.
• Malgré cet apparent état normal, une force énorme, qui n’a pas ébranlé les parois du réacteur, a soulevé de dix mètres son « couvercle » en béton, de trois mètres d’épaisseur et pesant quelque deux mille tonnes, qui a basculé sur le côté.
• Dans les restes de combustible nucléaire récupérés, la composition isotopique a changé, dans le sens d’un enrichissement en uranium 235, et cela jusqu’à 27%, alors que, dans un réacteur normal de ce type, ce rapport ne dépasse pas 2% et comme les barres devaient être changées, elles n’avaient pas plus de 1,1% de U235. D’autres morceaux avaient un enrichissement moindre, mais suffisant pour écarter l’hypothèse d’une erreur ou d’un simple hasard. Outre l’intérêt scientifique de cet étrange phénomène, quand on sait la difficulté et le prix de l’enrichissement de l’uranium, il y a de quoi attirer l’attention : la catastrophe peut inspirer un procédé, même si, en elle-même, elle n’en est pas un !
• En revanche, des quantités considérables d’éléments chimiques étrangers ont apparu, en particulier beaucoup d’aluminium, métal qui n’entre pas dans la construction du réacteur. Des métaux ont apparu dans le graphite de ralentissement des neutrons, alors qu’il était particulièrement pur à l’origine.
• Ajoutons encore que, pendant plusieurs jours, après la catastrophe, une intense lueur a rayonné au dessus du réacteur ansi découvert, émettant des - 3 - couleurs que tous les témoins ont qualifiées d’ « étranges ». Il va sans dire que, vu les circonstances, on avait mieux à faire que des analyses spectrales ! Le phénomène est resté inexpliqué.
• Autre problème, celui des isotopes Cs137 , Cs133 du césium, produits de désintégration de l’uranium, donc avec des concentrations proportionnelles au nombre n de neutrons émis. Mais Cs133 a tendance à « avaler » un neutron, avec une probabilité ~n, pour donnerCs133 + n = Cs134 . On a donc pour Cs134 une concentration ~ n 2 d’où un procédé chimique pour trouver le nombre de neutrons émis n en mesurant le rapport des deux concentrations Cs134 / Cs137 ~ n . Comme le réacteur était étroitement surveillé, on connaissait ce rapport avant la catastrophe, d’où se déduisait le degré d’épuisement du combustible : on a trouvé 10 (dans une unité internationale dont peu importe ici la définition, c’est le rapport qu compte). Or les deux isotopes ayant les mêmes propriétés chimiques et physiques, ce rapport ne varie pas dans le transport. Quand le nuage de Tchernobyl est arrivé à Münich, on a mesuré ce rapport : on a trouvé 12. Etant donné la fiabilité du procédé et la qualité des mesures des deux côtés, cette différence de 20% est inadmissibl et ne saurait résulter d’une erreur. Elle a fait scandale mais comme on n’a pas compris, on s’est rassuré en appellant ce rapport le « rapport de Tchernobyl ». Rappelons le mot de Roger Cotes dans la préface aux « Principia » : le fameux élève de Newton reprochait aux adversaires aristotéliciens de celui-ci de « préférer donner un nom aux choses plutôt que de chercher à l’intérieur des choses elles-mêmes ».
• Enfin, le principal fait à expliquer est le subit emballement du réacteur. Nous n’entrerons pas ici dans les polémiques concernant d’éventuelles erreurs du personnel, du protocole de sécurité ou de la construction. Nous ne cherchons pas la faute, mais le déroulement des faits : nous ne cherchons pas le « pourquoi ? » mais le « comment ? ». Nous voulons comprendre comment un réacteur à la limite d’épuisement de son combustible, dont la puissance lentement décroissante restait stationnaire depuis plus d’une demi-heure à 6% de sa puissance nominale, a pu passer en 10 secondes, à des dizaines de fois cette puissance nominale. C’est un problème purement scientifique
Extrait de l’émission « OVNIs et Centrales Nucléaires » diffusée le 28 juillet 2021 sur Nuréa TV
01h 14mn - 01h 48 mn
Un OVNI est-il intervenu sur lors de l’accident nucléaire de Tchernobyl empêchant ainsi une catastrophe encore plus grave ? Stéphane Royer nous apporte quelques informations pertinentes et un début de réponse dans cette vidéo !
Passionné par l’ufologie depuis 40 ans, Stéphane Royer donne des conférences à travers la France. Auteur de plusieurs articles publiés sur le sujet OVNI, il est également le co-auteur de l’ouvrage « Ovnis et nucléaire – Sommes-nous sous surveillance ? »
The chief engineer at the construction of the Chernobyl plant and an investigator after the accident, gives an account of the accident and its aftermath.
This dramatic, minute-by-minute account of the Chernobyl meltdown and its aftermath provides a detailed analysis of the causes of the disaster at the Soviet power station which became a "gigantic nuclear volcano" in April 1986, spewing out radioactivity. Former deputy chief engineer at Chernobyl, Medvedev cites design flaws that could spell catastrophe for similarly built plants. He also blames the accident on plant operators' faulty decision-making, made worse by flagrant safety violations; arrogant, careless managers; the "sheer insanity" of the plant's administrative system; and negligence at the highest levels of the Soviet energy bureaucracy. Interweaving the jolting testimony of eyewitnesses, participants and victims, this volume is invaluable.
Medvedev, a chief engineer at Chernobyl when it was built in 1970, graphically describes the events leading up to and following the world's worst nuclear accident. Asked to conduct an investigation less than two weeks after the explosion, he interviewed most of the major participants, including many who died within weeks from radiation sickness. In lucid detail and with an insider's understanding, Medvedev describes the human and technical failings that led to the accident and, with enormous compassion, recounts the efforts of firefighters and many of the reactor's operators who gave their lives in the struggle to contain the disaster. An authoritative primary document, this book is also an important rumination on the technological and political hubris that led to this disaster. For another Soviet account, see Zhores Medvedev's The Legacy of Chernobyl , LJ 6/15/90--Ed.
- Jennifer Scarlott, World Policy Inst., New York
In the wake of the 1986 disaster, the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant became a hotspot for UFO sightings. While writing Chernobyl: A Stalkers’ Guide I came across a number of reports of strange aerial phenomena in the area around the plant itself, as well as over the nearby Ukrainian capital, Kyiv. Then I started digging deeper – looking at the historical connection between UFO sightings, and places associated with nuclear research and power. Eventually this led me to Canada, where I realised that a famous 1967 UFO sighting – the ‘Falcon Lake Incident’ – might actually share a surprising and uncanny connection with the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone in Ukraine.
Originally I planned to mention these Chernobyl UFOs in the book. But the story quickly grew from a few interesting reports – a passing curiosity – into a whole chapter of its own. And this new UFO chapter, jumping about from Chernobyl to North Wales, to Roswell and Winnipeg (and filled throughout with unreliable words like “allegedly,” and “claimed,” and “believed”), increasingly felt like it didn’t belong in this book… which was otherwise evolving into quite a tight, keenly-focussed and evidence-driven volume.
So instead, I decided I would share this ‘missing chapter’ here: a deep dive into the subject of Chernobyl UFOs, starting in Ukraine, and ending with an account of my own trip to Falcon Lake, in 2019, to visit the site of an alleged UFO encounter that the press called the ‘Canadian Roswell.’
Lightning storm over Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant – seen from a Pripyat rooftop during a ‘stalker’ expedition
The Ferris wheel in Pripyat, at dusk
After the sun sets in the Chernobyl Zone, red lights illuminate the arch of the New Safe Confinement structure built to contain the destroyed Reactor Block 4
The Black Bird of Chernobyl
An event as unusual as the Chernobyl disaster tends to attract extraordinary stories. In April 2005, an article titled ‘Black Bird of Chernobyl’ appeared on the now-defunct website American Monsters. It described how employees at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, in the weeks before the 1986 meltdown, had been having nightmares and receiving strange, threatening phone calls, that warned of impending disaster. Some had even reported sightings of “a large, dark, headless man with gigantic wings and fire-red eyes”… though in the absence of evidence, their superiors dismissed these claims. The article describes how some first-responders at the disaster site reported a “20-foot bird” seen flying in and out of the column of smoke.
In 2019 the story was back in the news again. An Australian archeologist called Robert Maxwell, who previously made field trips to Chernobyl in 2010 and 2012, told the press that he heard legends about the Black Bird from locals while he was in the Exclusion Zone. However, in my own 20 trips to Chernobyl, I am still yet to hear the story there. Even online, the earliest account in Russian or Ukrainian links back to the American Monsters website as a source.
As it turns out, the Black Bird of Chernobyl was an American invention all along. The 2002 film The Mothman Prophecies, starring Richard Gere, is based on the ‘Mothman’ urban myth – about a mysterious, winged humanoid that allegedly warned citizens in Point Pleasant, West Virginia, of their impending doom in 1967. A character in the 2002 film alludes to similar phenomena that happened at Chernobyl; but according to the cryptozoologist Loren Coleman, who worked on the film, this was pure fiction. “There were no sightings. It was all made up for the movie,” he explained on Cryptomundo in 2011.
Elsewhere in America, another source would claim that intelligent alien lifeforms had taken an interest in the Chernobyl disaster. Dr George King – founder of a New Age religious movement known as the ‘Aetherius Society’ – claimed to have been sent a warning of impending disaster 4 hours and 53 minutes before the Chernobyl plant went critical, by his extraterrestrial contacts on a Martian spacecraft called Satellite Number Three. Dr King was ordered to immediately activate the earth’s “spiritual energy radiators,” and the story would then be used as evidence for the Aetherius Society’s claim that the “Cosmic Masters … have always regarded nuclear experimentation as the greatest threat to humanity and have made it clear that they would intervene where they were karmically allowed.”
However, unlike the Chernobyl-Mothman story, the idea that extraterrestrial lifeforms played a role in the disaster was not a claim limited solely to theorists on the other side of the planet. In fact, in the years following the Chernobyl catastrophe, many local people – and newspapers – would share stories about UFOs spotted in the skies over Chernobyl and Kyiv.
Detail of the ‘vibrators’ on the Duga-1 array – a now-abandoned Soviet over-the-horizon radar receiver which measures 150 metres tall, by 750 metres long. Over the years this alien-looking structure has attracted plenty of outlandish theories of its own
Left: the cover of НЛО – гости из будущего (UFOs – Guests From the Future) by V. Kratokhvil, 1992. Right: Vladimir Savran’s 1991 photograph of a ‘UFO’ over Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant’s Reactor Block 2
Training room inside the control complex for the Duga-1 radar. The system worked by sending and receiving signals bouncing around the earth’s ionosphere. During its years of operation, the Duga successfully recorded more than 100 Western missile launches, and was in the process of developing new systems to monitor aircraft movements as far away as British airspace
Chernobyl UFOs: Eyewitness Reports
Mikhail Varitsky, a senior dosimetrician with the Dosimetry Control Department, alleged that on the night of the Chernobyl disaster, he and many others had observed a UFO above Reactor 4. His statement was published in UFOs – Guests From the Future by V. Kratokhvil, in 1992: “We saw a ball of fire, and it was slowly flying in the sky. I think the ball was six or eight meters in diameter. Then we saw two rays of crimson light stretching towards the fourth unit. The object was some 300 meters from the reactor. The event lasted for about three minutes. The lights of the object went out and it flew away in the north-western direction.”
According to Varitsky’s dosimetric readings, the radiation levels coming from the reactor dropped from 3000 to 800 milli-roentgen per hour in that time, and the Russian news outlet Pravda, reporting on the sighting in 2002, would conclude: “The UFO brought the radiation level down. The level was decreased almost four times. This probably prevented a nuclear blast.”
‘Chernobyl UFOs’ became a hot topic in Ukraine in the years that followed. Dr Iva Naumovna Gospina (a medical doctor and author of self-help books) claimed to have photographed an object hovering above the station during subsequent malfunctions in September 1989. In August 1990, the Chernobyl Bulletin (Issue #64) reported another sighting:
“From 5:00 to 7:35 in the morning of 7 August, a new meeting with an unknown phenomenon took place. It was at this time that the workers of the Zone, living in the rotational village of Zeleny Mys, before leaving for work, observed in the area of the Ivankov township, at an altitude of 5-8 km, a shiny, luminous cylindrical object, resembling an empty spool of thread. The object periodically changed its configuration, the end discs were detached and their number changed from two to three. A red dot revolved around the cylinder. At 7:35, after the appearance of a military aircraft on the horizon, the UFO disappeared.”
In October 1990, the atomic scientist Alexander Krymov reported sighting another such craft above the Chernobyl Zone. The following year, a fire broke out in Chernobyl’s Reactor Block 2 on the evening of 11 October (the event that would lead to that unit’s final closure), and five days later a local photojournalist, Vladimir Savran of the Chernobyl Echo, would report another sighting. He was documenting the semi-collapsed roof in the generator hall, and saw nothing unusual with his naked eye: “The sky was autumn grey, but absolutely clear.” When he developed the film however, it appeared to show an object similar to that which Iva Gospina had photographed two years earlier, only this one seen from beneath.
Chernobyl Echo published the photo in November 1991, adding the editorial comment: “The property of UFOs being invisible to the human eye and appearing only in photographs and on film was reported in the press more than once… Specialists who, at the request of the publisher, have carefully studied the negative, do not allow any falsification.”
Before the Chernobyl disaster, reports of UFO sightings were a fairly rare occurrence in the Kyiv region. Four such claims were recorded in total, over the previous 30 years. However, in the years after 1986, numerous citizens, photographers and military personnel in the region would report sightings of strange, glowing objects in the sky, and these were recorded by the Commission on Anomalous Phenomena at the Ukrainian branch of NTO Radio Electronics and Communications.
Between 1986 and 1990, the pilot Pyotr Vladimirovich Wojciechowski claimed to have made more than a dozen sightings of individual objects and groups of UFOs.
In September 1988 the Kyiv resident Vadim Vasilyevich Shevchuk reported a sighting of two luminous objects floating above the Kyiv Institute for Nuclear Research, in the Exhibition (VDNKh) district of the city. His description was very similar to what Mikhail Varitsky said he saw, above the power plant on the night of the Chernobyl disaster.
On 12 November 1989, at 7.46 pm, the radar operator Lieutenant Colonel V. Shavanov, on duty at one of the region’s air defence radar stations, was notified of a luminous object sighted in the sky over the Exhibition district by residents of Kyiv. Shavanov called home, and spoke to his daughter who confirmed that from their ninth floor balcony she had just witnessed: “a white cross, a rectangle, and in it – like a fiery spiral, it seemed to be pulsating, illuminated.” A fighter-interceptor pilot was sent to the location, which was again very close to the Kyiv Institute of Nuclear Research; but he found nothing.
On 20 December 1989, another anomaly was sighted above the village of Irpen, between 6-7 pm, by the local resident Ivan Kucher. He reported a luminous flying object, which moved in the direction of Kyiv – and then later, at 8 pm, a similar glowing UFO was reported above Kyiv’s Central Stadium by the photojournalist Lyubov Kalenskaya.
Another sighting was made on 13 March 1990, in the area around Kyiv TV Tower (as reported in Junior Technician). At 10.13 pm, the local residents Denis Gnatyuk, Yuri Goncharenko and Dmitry Pinchuk say they saw a “mushroom-shaped” object with pulsating lights hovering in the sky. Another witness, Sergey Bryzgunov, made a similar report, saying that he watched the same display for roughly half an hour from the Golden Ear Hotel. A further witness for the 13 March sighting was Alexei Kurganov, who described watching the same object from the Borshchagovka area.
On 16 May 1990, the engineer Sergey Ogarkov, a member of the All-Union Astronomical Geodetic Society, claims that at just after 9 pm he observed through his telescope a single UFO moving in the western sky. Later that night, residents of the Troeschina residential district claimed to have seen two such objects (resembling “inverted plates”) hanging in the sky above them.
On 17 October 1990, another UFO was reportedly watched by many Kyiv residents, hanging in the sky above Khreshchatyk and Maidan Square. (The story likely first appeared in Evening Kyiv (Вечірній Київ), printed on 2 April 1991.) The following month, on 7 November, Kyiv resident Yuri Novikov was outside with his daughter just after midnight in the Kharkov district, when they saw what he would later describe as: “An object of enormous size, a cylindrical shape of a grey metallic colour, framed by a flickering halo, hanging from under low clouds.”
For context, it should be noted that most of these reports were not made public until the 1990s. In those early post-Soviet years, the newly-free press of Ukraine published an abundance of extraordinary stories, and convoluted conspiracy theories. Beginning in the late Soviet period, post-Glasnost, and into the post-Soviet period, large-scale financial scams and pyramid schemes were also prolific in the region. UFO reports were very much in vogue in these years, and while numerous sightings detailed above were allegedly made by photojournalists, very few actual photographs exist to back them up. Of the sightings detailed here, those which don’t link to other sources were listed by a 2011 article on a website calling itself Russian News Agency – where the writer also offered their own explanation for the connection between Chernobyl and UFOs:
“From these facts, the conclusion suggests itself that on the night of 26 April 1986, it was not only the people, heroically marching towards their hellish deaths, who were concerned about the impending catastrophe. In the light of these testimonies, it becomes clear that these elusive extraterrestrials are in fact not at all indifferent to the fate of mankind and the third planet from the Sun.”
The article in Junior Technician (Юный техник), from September 1990, details the sighting at Kyiv TV tower – as well as featuring this photograph taken by Ruslan Tazhetdinov, purportedly showing a UFO above Moscow
January mist gathers inside the cooling tower that was being built for Chernobyl Reactor Block 5. Construction was halted in 1986, after the disaster, leaving both the new reactor block and this cooling tower unfinished
Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in winter. Visible from right to left are Reactor Blocks 1 and 2, the chimney and grey roof of Reactor Block 3, and finally, the New Safe Confinement structure encasing the destroyed Reactor Block 4
Flying Saucers & Nuclear Power Plants
The suggestion that extraterrestrials had taken steps to protect humanity from its own nuclear technology was not a new idea. Around the world, sites of nuclear significance have historically shown some of the highest frequencies of UFO reports – a correlation that seems to continue today.
In March 1993, some kind of object was sighted hovering over the Hartlepool Nuclear Power Plant in northeast England. The ufologist Richard D. Hall was cited in a local newspaper, saying: “There is a history of UFOs taking an interest in nuclear energy so the sighting in Hartlepool is not a surprise.”
In 2014, nuclear power plants in France and Belgium were put on high alert after unidentified objects were sighted flying overhead. In total, eighteen overflights were reported in France alone, between the beginning of October and the beginning of November, with some of these flights taking place simultaneously, to suggest some kind of coordinated group action. The immediate explanation was that these were drones, though the identity – or motives – of the drone pilots has never become apparent. The director of one French plant refused the drone explanation however, insisting that the objects seen flying overhead were UFOs.
By French law, it is forbidden to fly a drone within 5 km of a nuclear power plant. Such laws can often be enforced through the use of signal scramblers, as well as ‘no-fly zones’ hardcoded into the software of the drones themselves. In 2015, on a road trip through Wales, I was with a friend when he tried flying his drone close to Trawsfynydd Nuclear Power Plant. We weren’t interested in the plant itself, our target was the dramatic view of a dammed reservoir downstream – but apparently we were too close for comfort, because as soon as the little drone was airborne it switched to autopilot, firing itself as fast as possible in the direction away from Trawsfynydd. It wouldn’t respond to manual controls again until we were far away from the nuclear power plant.
(After Gatwick Airport was temporarily closed due to a drone panic in 2018, the UK began looking at a whole range of new counter-drone technologies that might be applied at sites such as airports or power plants. In addition to RF and GPS jammers, this report from the ADS (representing the UK’s Aerospace, Defence, Security and Space industries) considers further options, such as the deployment of ‘hunter/killer’ drones, laser defence systems, and even trained birds of prey.)
Trawsfynydd Nuclear Power Plant was closed and began its decommissioning process in 1991. Perhaps their installation of anti-drone technology was a caution built on experience – as in 2002, the plant had its own UFO sighting. In March that year, Officer Brian Roberts claimed that he and his wife had seen a flying craft hovering for around 10 minutes near the plant one evening. He described it as saucer-shaped, with “a brilliant perimeter of light moving in a circular pattern along its vertical midline” (as cited in UFO FAQ by David J. Hogan).
Trawsfynydd Nuclear Power Plant, North Wales. Constructed from 1959-65, this power plant building was designed by the celebrated Modernist architect Basil Spence. It was taken offline to begin decommissioning in 1991
By the 1980s, much Soviet art and literature was preoccupied with the conquest of space. This colourful mural inside the Duga-1 radar control centre, near the Chernobyl NPP, depicts Soviet cosmonauts building an advanced future space station
Another wall mural inside the control block of the Duga-1 radar station. This one seems to depict ordinary citizens, enjoying a peaceful life in a futuristic Soviet utopia
In 2017, The New York Times reported that of the US Defense Department’s annual $600 billion budget, $22 million was spent on its Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program. This military intelligence program (which was allegedly discontinued in 2012) investigated reports of UFOs, and it was run out of an office on the fifth floor of the Pentagon building by Luis Elizondo. The program collected unidentified aeronautical debris, as well as compiling archives of video and audio recordings of UAPs (Unexplained Aerial Phenomena) going back as early as WWII. According to Elizondo, many such sightings correlated with nuclear facilities and test sites.
In the 1940s, what is perhaps the most famous UFO incident in history is linked to a location less than 100 miles from the site of the first nuclear bomb test. The seven-mile high mushroom cloud that rose above White Sands Proving Ground, New Mexico, in July 1945, was visible from Roswell – where two years later, in July 1947, a local ranch foreman discovered unidentified debris in his field after a thunderstorm. The Roswell case has since been explained (revealing that this wreckage was not alien in origin, but rather had been an experimental Cold War-era listening device, named Project Mogul), but there have been many sightings of unexplained aerial phenomena at the location since, which are harder to explain.
The journalist and UAP researcher George Knapp interviewed more than a dozen workers from the New Mexico atomic test site, where allegedly such sightings were so commonplace that a specific security detail was assigned to monitor them. According to Knapp, “At the facilities where we were first designing and building nuclear weapons… at the places where we were processing the fuel… at the facilities where we were testing the weapons… at the bases where we deployed those weapons, on the ships… the nuclear submarines… All those places, all the people working there have seen these things.”
The Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell, the sixth man to set foot on the moon, grew up in New Mexico himself, and in 2015 he told the Observer: “it seems that most likely what the aliens were interested in was the fact we had a weapons testing facility at the White Sands Proving Ground and were also interested in what we were doing or what the U.S. military was doing. They were observing our activities at the White Sands Proving Ground and were monitoring our development.”
Mitchell has also been quoted talking about more recent incidents, in which UFOs were suggested to have interfered with – or even prevented – nuclear missile tests. “I have spoken to many Air Force officers who worked at these silos during the Cold War,” he says. “They told me UFOs were frequently seen overhead and often disabled their missiles. Other officers from bases on the Pacific coast told me their [test] missiles were frequently shot down by alien spacecraft. There was a lot of activity in those days.”
Regardless of the accuracy of such claims, it is a fact that UFO sightings have been reported with a greater frequency around places associated with nuclear technology. Perhaps this is because some extraterrestrial species is guiding our scientific development… or perhaps there’s a more human explanation for the correlation. Centuries ago, our wars left cities in ruin; industrial disasters could destroy a forest, or pollute a water stream. However, since the beginning of the Atomic Era – the dawn of the Anthropocene – we have been living with the existential horror of knowing that our mistakes, and conflicts, can now cause damage not just on a local, but on a planetary scale. How reassuring it would be then, to believe that we had grown-ups supervising us… to suppose that we weren’t truly left alone in the universe, to live with the consequences of our own (atomic) actions.
The reports of UFOs over the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant certainly conform to this trend in the West, going back as early as the first atomic tests, which supposes that extraterrestrial craft are taking an interest in our nuclear activities, with the ultimate goal of protecting us from ourselves. But of all the Western sightings, there is one in particular that shares an unexpected connection with the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone: an event which the press called the ‘Canadian Roswell,’ and which occurred at Falcon Lake, Manitoba, in 1967.
This clearing in Whiteshell Forest, a couple of miles north of Falcon Lake in Manitoba, is where Stefan Michalak reported having his 1967 encounter with a grounded extraterrestrial craft
Left: Stefan Michalak’s sketch of the UFO he encountered near Falcon Lake in 1967. Right: Michalak’s burnt clothing, and an inset showing the unexplained burns he received across his body, after getting too close to the craft’s exhaust. (Images via University of Manitoba Archives & Special Collections)
The Incident at Falcon Lake
On 20 May 1967, a Polish mechanic and amateur geologist named Stefan Michalak was out in the woods 150 km east of Winnipeg, Manitoba, prospecting for silver and quartz in the rocks around Falcon Lake. While he stopped to eat lunch, Michalak spotted something in the sky. He later described: “Two cigar-shaped objects with humps on them,” which “appeared to be descending and glowing with an intense scarlet glare.”
While one of the objects stopped roughly 25 feet (7.6 metres) above the ground, hovered and then departed, the other landed on top of a flat rock at the water’s edge. After sketching the shape of the craft, Michalak approached it, initially believing this to be some kind of experimental US aircraft – though he saw no markings or insignia on the hull. An opening appeared on the side of the craft, and Michalak assumed it had landed here to make repairs. The warm air radiating from the craft smelled strongly of sulphur. He heard voices from inside and called out to them, offering help. There was no reply.
According to Michalak’s story, he got close enough to the craft to touch its hull (burning his glove in the process), and he peered inside the open hatch to see an interior full of blinking lights; before the hatch suddenly closed, and the craft turned, blasting him with a wave of intense heat from an exhaust that set his shirt and undershirt alight, before taking off and flying away.
Soil analysis report from the Crime Lab of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, July 1967. The sample showed a level of 0.3 microCuries, “a possible serious health hazard.” (Image appears courtesy of Chris Rutkowski.)
The ‘landing site’ near Falcon Lake. These rocks were later shown to have above-normal levels of radiation, some of which was emanating from a metallic substance inside
A commemorative plaque in honour of Dr Louis Slotin. Luxton Avenue, Winnipeg
Stefan Michalak became severely unwell following the encounter. In the immediate aftermath he suffered from nausea, vomiting and some visual impairment, eventually making his way back to a hospital where he was treated for first degree burns on his chest. Dr Horace Dudley, a radiologist at the University of Southern Mississippi, described the symptoms as “a classical picture of severe whole body [exposure to] radiation with x- or gamma rays,” which might have implied that, “Mr Michalak received on the order of 100-200 roentgens.” However, on 22 May, Michalak was taken to the Atomic Energy of Canada Laboratory at Pinawa, where examiners found no evidence of radiation sickness – while his burns were identified as thermal and chemical, rather than from radiation. Nevertheless, over the coming days the pain in his head persisted, and a complete loss of appetite caused Michalak to lose significant weight.
Soil samples later collected from the ‘landing site’ showed above-average levels of radiation, at 0.3 microcuries. The burns on Michalak’s chest, meanwhile, swelled up in a grid-like pattern of rashes. These would continue to fade and then reappear until his death in 1999.
The press began referring to the Falcon Lake incident as the ‘Canadian Roswell.’ What set it apart from most UFO reports was the amount of physical evidence left behind – Michalak’s peculiar scars, his melted glove, his burnt cap and undershirt, along with samples of radioactive dirt – which were passed from expert to expert (the universities, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Royal Canadian Air Force), none of whom were able to explain it. When investigators sent their lab reports to the Department of Health and Welfare in Ottawa, it raised panic over a possible risk of radioactive contamination. There were talks about closing off the area and creating an exclusion zone, though eventually, it was decided that the radiation levels – while unusual – were not sufficiently dangerous to justify such extreme action.
In 1968, Stefan Michalak returned to Falcon Lake. He had a theory that the radiation might be emanating from something beneath the rock itself. When he chipped open a crack with his rock hammer, he found metal: smooth zigzags of silver roughly four to five inches long, that fit the fissure of the rock as if the metal had been poured in molten. These silver artefacts were shown to be unusually radioactive, and according to his son, Michalak would joke that “this was alien refuse. Perhaps the craft had landed to offload some waste and what they had was, basically, UFO droppings.”
North American White Pelican fish the waters of Whiteshell Forest, close to the location of the 1967 ‘Falcon Lake Incident.’ Beside the highway nearby are a series of campsites, restaurants, and UFO-themed souvenir shops
Chris Rutkowski, the preeminent ufologist in Canada and an expert on the Falcon Lake Incident, giving a tour of the landing site in Whiteshell Forest
A Roadside Picnic in Manitoba
A few years after the press reported Michalak’s sighting at Falcon Lake in Canada, two authors in the Soviet Union wrote a sci-fi novel about an alien visitation. In the book, called Roadside Picnic, it is suggested that extraterrestrial craft have landed on earth to conduct routine maintenance (or even perhaps for a ‘roadside picnic’) before travelling onwards to their final destination elsewhere. The areas where these craft landed are subsequently left scattered with alien litter. Strange artefacts, dangerous substances and lingering radiation pollute the landscape, and necessitate the creation of an exclusion zone around the landing site. The novel’s authors, Boris and Arkady Strugatsky, did not set this story at home, in the Soviet Union – but rather it is hinted, and later explicitly stated in Ursula K. Le Guin’s foreword for the 2012 edition, that the events of Roadside Picnic take place in Canada.
In June 2019 I visited Falcon Lake with Chris Rutkowski, a resident ufologist, and a leading authority on the Falcon Lake Incident. We met in Winnipeg – a city that has its own tragic connection to the Los Alamos atomic tests in New Mexico. One of the first deaths by criticality accident (an uncontrolled nuclear fission chain reaction) was that of a Winnipegger. Louis Slotin was a Winnipeg-born scientist with a PhD in physical chemistry, who in 1942 was invited to work on the Manhattan Project in the US. In May 1946, he was conducting an experiment to create a controlled fission reaction by placing two hemispheres of beryllium around a plutonium core. But while separating those half-spheres his tool slipped, the upper beryllium shell fell, and it triggered a critical reaction that gave off a burst of hard radiation. The other scientists present for the experiment reported a heat wave, and a glowing blue light resulting from air ionisation.
According to the plaque that now stands in a memorial park near Slotin’s former home, on Luxton Avenue in Winnipeg, Dr Louis Slotin threw his body over the experiment to shield his colleagues from the radiation. All seven of them survived, while Slotin died nine days later in the hospital. The story has since been dramatised in a number of novels and films – and it has also been suggested that Dr Louis Slotin may have been the inspiration for the character Dr Jon Osterman, who becomes the glowing blue ‘Doctor Manhattan’ after suffering a similar accident, in Alan Moore’s Watchmen. (“The Superman exists and he’s American Canadian.”)
Two hours east of Winnipeg along the Trans-Canada Highway (and not far from the former Whiteshell Nuclear Research Establishment), at the west end of Falcon Lake we arrive in a kind of seasonal resort village. There are lakeside campgrounds, a golf course and restaurants, as well as various souvenir shops selling T-shirts, mugs and keyrings branded with flying saucers and grey alien faces (‘Zeta Reticulans,’ for those in the know). Michalak didn’t make his sighting at Falcon Lake itself, but rather a little way north, beside a smaller, crescent-shaped body of water in Whiteshell Forest. It’s only a few kilometres from the highway, but the difficult path alternates between rocks and marsh – so instead of walking, our small group approaches the landing site on horseback.
Returning to Falcon Lake in 1968, Stefan Michalak found slivers of metal moulded into the rocks of the landing site. Michalak described them as “UFO droppings,” and he gave this one to Chris Rutkowski as a gift
The artefact: the metal has been identified as mostly silver, and it shows above-average traces of radiation, owing to small amounts of uranium ore.
The forest is still. Pelicans patiently fish the ponds and streams. At times the clatter of our horses’ hooves along the rock and shingle path is the only sound to break the hush beneath the trees. We spot piles of what looks to be bear scat in the grass.
At the landing site, we tether our horses in the trees. Entering the clearing beside the water, Chris Rutkowski stands on the same rock where Michalak said the craft had landed in 1967, as he talks us through the timeline of events. The forest clearing feels like a natural amphitheatre. In the late 1960s, the Falcon Lake incident was big news in the West… and the subsequent novel, written by the Strugatskys in 1971, echoed many of the same story beats. An alien craft landing for maintenance, the radioactive pollution and strange artefacts it left behind; that they also went so far as to set their story in Canada, of all places, seems like too much for coincidence. But I find myself wondering how realistic it is that the Falcon Lake story made its way into the Soviet Union, where state censors tended to be highly efficient at filtering out foreign stories and perspectives.
The Strugatskys’ friend and colleague, Polish author Stanisław Lem, wrote about alien visitations himself: The Man From Mars (1946) deals with the discovery of a downed Martian vessel on earth; in The Astronauts (1951), Lem incorporates a real world mystery into his narrative, revealing that the meteorite which caused the Tunguska event in Russia in 1908 had actually been the crash-landing of a reconnaissance ship from a Venusian invasion fleet. Stanisław Lem also read international news magazines, which at the time were not officially easy to acquire in communist Poland, and he was aware of the growing trend of UFO sightings reported in the West (though he tended to doubt them), as he revealed in a 1981 interview. So it is perhaps not a stretch to imagine that the Strugatsky brothers themselves were similarly informed on such reports, and thus might have been familiar with details of the ‘Canadian Roswell’ event at Falcon Lake in 1969. Though as neither of them is still around to ask, we’ll probably never know for sure.
What is known however, is the extraordinary impact that the Strugatskys’ novel, Roadside Picnic, has had in shaping the contemporary culture around Chernobyl. The book and its later Tarkovsky film adaptation, Stalker, created a cultural blueprint for the Chernobyl Zone a decade before the disaster ever happened. The illegal tourists who visit Chernobyl today call themselves ‘stalkers,’ the same name the Strugatskys coined for the trespassers who hunted for alien artefacts in the radioactive exclusion zone around their fictional UFO landing site; while numerous sites inside the Chernobyl Zone today make reference to the novel – such as the ‘Roadside Picnic Grill Bar.’ In 2007, the Ukrainian-made video game S.T.A.L.K.E.R. introduced the Strugatskys’ story to a new generation. Many of the tourists who visit Chernobyl today report that their interest in the Zone began with the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. games… but more than that, even some of the top tour directors, the people responsible for shaping the Chernobyl tourism experience, were fans of the game, and the Strugatskys’ ideas, before they ever set foot inside the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone (a fact revealed in interviews, in Chernobyl: A Stalkers’ Guide).
Beginning in the 1990s, a time when dozens of UFO sightings were suddenly being reported in the skies above a newly-independent Ukraine, Roadside Picnic provided the default template for the mystification of Chernobyl; and its story continues to shape the Chernobyl tourism experience even now. Stood beside a small, marshy lake in the forests of southern Manitoba, I wonder if it’s really possible to trace a lot of that back to an unexplained event that happened here, in May 1967.
We ride the horses back to the ranch at Falcon Lake, where the owners cook up a cowboy barbecue – steaks, baked potatoes and beans – which we eat al fresco, under the dusky early evening sky. Chris says he has something to show me. He keeps the artefact sealed inside a series of nested Tupperware containers like Matryoshka dolls. He pops open the clasps, opens the innermost container, then passes me a cool metallic object in the shape of a zigzag. It was given to him by Stefan Michalak: one of the metal artefacts found in the rocks at Falcon Lake, and alleged, by some, to be extraterrestrial in origin. One of Michalak’s “UFO droppings.” The metal is warped but smooth, like a silver door hinge bent into curious angles, and it looks slightly bubbled at the edges, as if it has been subjected to a great heat. I ask if it’s radioactive, and Chris gives a half-shrug. More than it should be, he explains: lab tests showed the metal was mostly solid silver, but with trace amounts of uranium ore in it too; just not enough to be particularly dangerous.
I move the object about in my hands. It is light, but satisfying to hold, and with a kind of fascinating allure about it. The stalker Redrick Schuhart, the protagonist of Roadside Picnic, had entered the alien landing site in Canada looking for the rarest artefact of all: a “Golden Sphere.” Now here I am at the end of my own expedition, holding a Silver Zigzag – and it feels like a fitting end to a very strange day.
Acknowledgments
I couldn’t have created this article on my own. Huge thanks go to Anton Lebedev, who spent many hours translating 1990s Russian-language newspaper stories for me. The 2017 book When They Appeared, by Chris Rutkowski and Stan Michalak, has been a fantastic resource on the Falcon Lake incident – and Chris has also been incredibly helpful in answering all my various questions about it since. The University of Manitoba is currently running a fundraiser – the UFOs in Canada Archival Fund – to digitise all of Chris Rutkowski’s research, including interviews and reports of Canadian UFO sightings going back many decades, and to make the whole collection publicly accessible online. This is a huge undertaking, and if that sounds interesting then perhaps you’ll consider donating to the cause.
I also owe a debt of gratitude here to the various lovely people who are supporting my work on Patreon. An article this long, and this dense, takes an incredible amount of time to research and write. I simply would not have been able to create this without your support – so thank you.
For anyone curious to visit the places mentioned in this article, I am now co-leading tours not only to the Chernobyl Exclusion Zone, but also to Falcon Lake in Manitoba. These trips are running through Atlas Obscura, and pandemic allowing, I hope to be heading back to the landing site again this summer…
Source: https://www.exutopia.com/chernobyl-ufos-falcon-lake/
Did a UFO nearly start World War III in October of 1982? Some former Soviet military believe that it, in fact, may have just happened.
Following the complete collapse of the Soviet Union in December of 1991. A few Soviet military commanders started to come forward to talk about an incident that took place on the night of October 4th, 1982. Some former Soviet military commanders believe that we may have been much closer to World War III due to this one particular incident. On the night of October 4th, 1982, a large ufo was reported hovering above the Soviet nuclear missle base near the Ukrainian town of Byelokoroviche.
Pages 139-143
The dimension of this object was reported to be as high as Some time into the encounter, several R-12 nuclears missiles activated without permission to launch the missles being received from Moscow. Before the missiles activated, none of the missile launch officers had activated the launch sequences on the missiles. When the object first appeared over the base and the general area. Twenty year old radio operator Vladimir Matveyev and close to one thousand soldiers and Soviet officers watched the ufo for nearly an hour as it hovered over the base housing the Soviet R-12 nuclear missiles. This object, as described by Matveyev, hovered at a distance of nearly a mile and a half away from where Matveyev and his fellow soldiers were stationed at. According to Matveyev, this object was nearly as tall as a five story house.
Captain Valery Polykhaev, who was on his way home, reported seeing two brightly lit objects at around three to four miles in altitude. These two objects, according to Polykhaev, appeared to be in the shape of a Christmas tree decoration. He also reported that these objects were anywhere between one to two miles apart from each other. In his report to Moscow, Captain Polykhaev also stated that the objects changed from one ellpitical shape to a straight line. Several other Soviet commanders in the same area also reported seeing the same object from several different locations in and around Byelokoroviche at that time. Later on that evening, Captain Polykhaev reported seeing the same object around 8PM that day.
This time, it was reported that the object had flashed brightly and went out. It then reappeared to flash again before an elliptical arrangement of six to eight lights surrounded the object. After the object flashed the last time, a ball of light appeared to break off and flew towards the ground, disappearing before reaching the surface. Captain Kovalenko, who was in Captain Polykhaev's car with him, also reported nearly the same exact thing to Moscow after the event.
Major Lipezki and Captain Ryabinin were driving along a road between the villages of Perebrody and Usovo when they saw the object as well. In a report to the Kremlin, Lipezki reported that the object itself was hovering somewhere above the village of Usovo. They reported seeing the lights as five groups in an area nearly as equal to the setting sun on the horizon. At the time they spotted the lights, these objects were hovering about ninety to one hundred feet above the edge of a nearby forest.
Along with Major Lipezki and Captain Ryabinin, Senior Lieutenant Kobulyansky and Major Drobakhin reported seeing unidentified objects on the road to Byelokoroviche between the hours of 7:30 and 9:00PM that night. One of them reported that an electromagnetic effect of some kind had affected the radio of the car in which they were travelling in. It is possible that the car radio they had on may have been affected by an electromagnetic force if an unidientified flying object was responsible. If you folks ever have your AM radio turned on in your vehicle. If you pass under power lines with the AM radio on, you will hear static that is being generated by the electromagnetic field surrounding the power lines.
At the same exact time, a much different story was going on in the bunker when the object was overhead and as the object was being sighted by military commanders in the area. Major M. Davidovich Kataman, senior assistant to the commander of Military Unit 52035's communication's service, who was in charge of computerized control panels for the long range missiles located at the base. Even though he did not see the object himself since he was down in the bunker. What he saw in military speak was the stuff of nightmares for him and his fellow officers. In his report to Moscow, he stated that he observed the spontaneous lumination of all the displays on the control panels for the missiles. Judging by what Major Kataman saw, he believed that someone or something was putting in the precise launch codes to activate the missiles.
These launch codes regulated the computerized missile launch control panel. Testing of the parameter measurement on the apparatus showed no defects with the machine according to the technical maps. According to the technical maps for the apparatus, it was functioning as it was designed to. However, that was before and after the displays had lit up. It is believed that the object may have sent a powerful electro-magnetic pulse down to the bunker. Which, in turn, activated the missiles' launch control sequence.
According to the "investigation" conducted by the KGB and the Kremlin at the time. The given explanation to the unexplained lights was due to military exercises being conducted in the area. The closest military exercise going on that night was happening over two hundred miles away. Then how do you explain the mysterious activation of the launch control panel to several nuclear missiles when no one had ordered or gave the authorization codes to permit a launch? If it was a military exercise, then why hadn't any commander in the area been notified that an exercise was taking place? If that is the case, then what was it that over one thousand military personnel had witnessed or experienced first hand that night?
Source: https://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread644797/pg1
It is not a joke, nor a hoax, nor a sign of mental instability, nor an attempt to drum up local tourism by drawing the curious, the Soviet press agency Tass insisted today in discussions of what it called an extraterrestrial visit to southern Russia.
Residents of the city of Voronezh insisted today that lanky, three-eyed extraterrestrial creatures had indeed landed in a local park and gone for a stroll and that a seemingly fantastic report about the event carried Monday by the official press agency Tass was absolutely true.
''It was not an optical illusion,'' said Lieut. Sergei A. Matveyev of the Voronezh district police station, who said in a telephone interview that he saw the landing of the U.F.O. on Sept. 27.
Lieutenant Matveyev confessed that he had not actually seen the aliens, but said he saw the spaceship and ''it was certainly a body flying in the sky,'' moving noiselessly at a very high speed and very low altitude. 'Anything Is Possible'
To be honest, Lieutenant Matveyev said, he was a little skeptical himself when he first saw the object. ''I thought I must be really tired,'' he said. ''but I rubbed my eyes and it didn't go away. Then I figured, in this day and age, anything is possible.''
Using the sensationalist tone that has lately infected the once-staid Tass, the press agency today provided more details of the U.F.O. landing in Voronezh, a city some 300 miles southeast of Moscow.
According to Tass, and a report today in the newspaper Sovetskaya Kultura, two boys and a girl from a local school - Vasya Surin, Zhenya Blinov and Yuliya Sholokhova - were playing in a park on the warm evening of Sept. 27 when suddenly, at half past six, ''they saw a pink shining in the sky and then spotted a ball of deep red color'' about 10 yards in diameter. A crowd gathered, ''and they could clearly see a hatch opening in the lower part of the ball and a humanoid in the opening.'' A Stare Silences Boy
The three-eyed creature, about nine feet tall and fashionably dressed in silvery overalls and bronze boots and with a disk on its chest, disappeared, then landed and came out for a promenade with a companion and a robot.
The aliens seemed to communicate with each other, producing the mysterious appearance of a shining triangle, and activated the robot with a touch.
Terrified, a boy began to scream, but with a stare of the alien's shining eyes, Tass said, the boy was silenced and paralyzed.
After a brief disappearance, the three returned, but this time one of the ''humanoids'' had ''what looked like a gun'' by his side - a tube about two feet long that it directed at a 16-year-old boy. The boy, whose name was not given in the report, promptly vanished, but reappeared after the alien embarked in the ball.
Vladimir A. Moiseyev, director of the regional health department, said in a telephone interview that despite reports of widespread fear in the city, none of the witnesses had applied for medical help. But he said that ''certainly we are planning to examine the children.'' There was no explanation why, with the passing of two weeks, such an examination had not yet taken place. Report Treated Seriously
Mr. Moiseyev, like other authorities in Voronezh, the editors of Tass, and indeed many of its readers, treated the report as a serious scientific phenomenon. No extra men are assigned to patrol the area because the department is short-handed, said the duty officer at the local Interior Ministry department, who identified himself only by his last name, Larin, but he said troops would be dispatched ''if they appear again.''
The Tass correspondent covering the case of the mysterious visitors to Voronezh, Vladimir V. Lebedev, seemed insulted that anyone would treat the story with anything but the full seriousness that it was given by the agency.
In a telephone interview, Mr. Lebedev described conversations with dozens of witnesses and with experts who had examined the evidence and spoken to the children. He said there were about three landings of the U.F.O between Sept. 23 and Sept. 29.
In the latest development, not yet reported by Tass, Mr. Lebedev said that Genrikh M. Silanov, head of the Voronezh Geophysical Laboratory, today asked the children to draw what they had seen. Drawings Said to Be Similar
Though isolated from one another, he said, the children all drew a banana-shaped object that left behind in the sky the sign of the letter X. Such descriptions, Mr. Silanov said, were reported as typical of U.F.O.'s in a 1976 article in the now defunct American magazine Saga. Mr. Silanov said today that a rock that was reportedly found at the site and described as being not something found on earth was actually a form of hematite, which is found in various parts of the Soviet Union.
While not a witness himself, Mr. Lebedev said he had visited the site. ''The traces were still seen,'' he said. ''I could see holes of a clear shape that resembled the footprints of an elephant.''
He said his reports from Voronezh would continue.
https://www.nytimes.com/1989/10/11/world/ufo-landing-is-fact-not-fantasy-the-russians-insist.html