0640 - The OZ Factor
The Oz Factor, a term coined by ufologists and author Jenny Randles (b. 1951), refers to the experience of being isolated or transported by the real world of everyday life into another environment which is quite similar to the real world but changed enough to be noticeable and disturbing. Such reports have been common in both UFO and paranormal accounts, but had been pushed aside (their evidential value being somewhat limited) until Randles called attention to such experiences as a common element in some types of UFO encounters.
Folklorist Peter M. Rojcewicz recounted such an experience in 1980 while working on his Ph.D. dissertation, which happened to be on UFOs. While working in the library, he had a strange encounter with a man who approached the table at which he worked and engaged him in conversation. As they talked on the subject of his dissertation, the man suddenly shouted accusingly, "Flying saucers are the most important fact of the century, and you are not interested?" Shortly thereafter he left. Rojcewicz was relieved at his departure, thinking the man disturbed. However, as he tried to return to his work, he had a feeling that all was not right. Unable to stay seated, he wandered around the library. He noticed that no librarians were staffing the desks and that no patrons seemed to be in the library. In a mild panic, he returned to his working space and tried to settle his mind. An hour later when he finally left the library, all seemed to have returned to normal.
Such experiences often appear as an aspect of a longer story of paranormal encounters, doing more to describe the atmosphere surrounding more spectacular or definitive experiences. Also, such stories appear closely related to phenomena like déjà vu, which make an impact upon the person experiencing them, but only minimally impress one to whom the story is told. Stories abound of people who have felt a presence, sensed some guidance or seen something that led them to sense that they had been unwittingly pulled away from the normal sequence of experiences. It is almost impossible to further investigate the anecdotal accounts, however reality-shattering they might be to the person experiencing them.
Sources:
Randles, Jenny. "In Search of the Oz Factor." BUFORA Bulletin 26 (July 1987): 17-18.
Rojcewicz, Peter M. The Boundaries of Orthodoxy: A Folkloric Look at the UFO Phenomenon. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University, Ph.D. diss., 1984.
Source: https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/oz-factor
In UFO Reality (1983) Jenny Randles refers to the “sensation of being isolated, or transported from the real world into a different environmental framework,” and suggests this feeling, occasionally reported by UFO witnesses, “is one of great importance to our understanding of UFOs. It is almost suggestive of the witness being transported temporarily from our world into another, where reality is but slightly different. . . . I call it ‘the Oz Factor,’ after the fairy-tale land of Oz.” In Sixth Sense (1987), her study of psychic phenomena, Randles equates the Oz Factor with what psychologists and parapsychologists call “altered states of consciousness.”
_____________________________________________________
In the UFO context, one Oz Factor report took place on July 21, 1978, at 10:15 on a warm summer’s evening in Davyhulme, Manchester, England, to a couple Randles calls Mr. and Mrs. W. The two observed a dark disc hovering in the twilight sky. It was surrounded by an aura, from which 30 to 40 beautiful purple rays shot out at various angles like spokes from a wheel, extending to about 12 times the diameter of the central disc. After one and a half minutes, Randles writes, “the ‘rays’ collapsed inwards in sequence, and the object slowly extinguished itself. It was massive, compared with the size of the rooftop opposite.” During the sighting the Ws noted with puzzlement that the normally busy street was strangely quiet and devoid of vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Mrs. W later said that she felt “singled out” and “alone” as she and her husband watched the object.
_____________________________________________________
Another such incident was reported by Jean Findlay of Poole, Dorset. At 9:01 on the morning of December 6, 1980, as she was waiting for a bus, she felt an urge to “look up . . . almost as if a voice in my head told me to do so.” She saw a disc-shaped UFO with a dome on top hovering above nearby trees. Feeling “spellbound” and experiencing a sensation of “peace, calm, and warmth,” she watched the object emit a beam of light, rotate once, and fly away at a great rate of speed. When she looked at her watch, she found “time had flown by”—four minutes when it seemed as if the sighting had lasted only a few moments. Though the sighting had occurred at rush hour in a busy city, she said everything became “quiet” during the sighting, and she saw no one else around (Randles, 1983).
_____________________________________________________
A possible Oz Factor episode figures in a sighting reported in Novato, California, on April 15, 1989. At 5:30 that afternoon a father and son saw, from their front lawn and at about 75 degrees on the horizon, a slowly descending object shaped like “two spheres connected together by a stem”—a dumbbell, in other words. The two spheres were golden with a white halo around them.
According to psychologist-UFO investigator Richard F. Haines, who interviewed the witnesses five weeks later, “the apparent angular size of the dumbbell was just less than the apparent width of [the father’s] thumbnail (at arm’s length) or about 1.5 degrees.” With naked eye and through binoculars, four smaller objects, golden discs, maneuvered near the original object. Haines wrote that the father “also noted the strange absence of kids and dogs at the time they watched the object. There are usually many present at this time of day.” The witness remarked, “It was strange—there was no one else who saw it” (Haines, 1989). No report of the objects appeared in the newspapers.
_____________________________________________________
A spectacular Oz Factor episode, with physical effects (technically a close encounter of the second kind), reportedly occurred half a mile south of Proberta, California, at around 5:45 one morning in December 1959. Larry Jensen was driving to work on U.S. Highway 99 when his radio began making “snapping” noises and his lights dimmed. He pulled over to the side of the road and got out to check his headlights, which he was distressed to find were now shining as feebly as flashlight bulbs operating on run-down batteries.
Out of the corner of his eye, he spotted a huge, bright, bluish-green crescent-shaped object hovering about 60 feet above the road a quarter-mile behind him. It appeared to be 80 to 90 feet across and 15 to 20 feet thick. Suddenly and inexplicably, he found that his clothes were soaked, and he felt an alarming sensation as if he were being crushed inside. Also, as he would tell investigators, “I felt like I was being sucked up in space toward the object, as by a magnet.”
He lunged for the car door, hoping to grab the rifle he always took with him, but instead he collided with the side mirror and staggered backward. On a second try he managed to get inside. When he glanced at the rearview mirror, he could not see the object. Looking out the right-door window, however, he saw the UFO a few miles away, heading northeast and climbing at a shallow angle over the Sierra foothills. Less than 10 seconds later it had vanished from sight.
Jensen’s car lights came back on. Relieved, he resumed his journey, only to stop again 200 yards later when he smelled burning rubber. On lifting up the hood, he saw that his battery caps had blown out. The battery itself was “bulged out of shape,” the generator was not working, and the armature and field wires had melted together.
According to an investigative report, there was another bizarre element to the experience: Something else that stood out in his mind was that he did not encounter a single car on this highway from shortly before this episode until he was about 1/2 mile north of Proberta. He believes this is the only time in his life this has happened. U.S. 99 W is the main highway from San Francisco to Portland and Seattle. It carries heavy traffic. (Cerny, Tice, and Staver, 1968)
In Randles’ view, “The existence of the Oz factor certainly points towards the consciousness of the witness as the focal point of the UFO encounter. . . . Subjective data that override objective reality . . . could be internal (from a deeper level of ourselves) or external (for example, from some other intelligence). It may even be both.”
Sources
Cerny, Paul, Kenneth Tice, and Robert Staver. UFO Sighting Report. California: The Authors, 1968.
Haines, Richard F. “Daylight Dumbbell.” International UFO Reporter 14, no. 5 (September/October 1989): 12–13, 23.
Randles, Jenny. “In Search of the Oz Factor.” BUFORA Bulletin 26 (July 1987): 17–18.
———. Sixth Sense. Topsfield, MA: Salem House Publishers, 1987.
———. UFO Reality: A Critical Look at the Physical Evidence. London: Robert Hale, 1983.
Late one November afternoon in 1980, at the University of Pennsylvania library, Peter M. Rojcewicz was doing research for a Ph.D. dissertation on the folklore of UFOs. “I sat alone in a wing facing a large window to the south,” he would recall. “I had the table closest to the window, facing the window. Without any sound to indicate that someone was approaching me from behind, I noticed from the corner of my right eye what I supposed was a man’s black pant leg. He was wearing rather worn black leather shoes.”
The stranger walked around the table and briefly looked out the window, his back to Rojcewicz, then turned and sat down. He was dark-complexioned, tall, thin, sunken-eyed, and wearing a rumbled black suit too big for him. Speaking articulately with a slight accent Rojcewicz thought to be “European,” he asked what the young man was doing. A short conversation on UFOs followed as Rojcewicz, who was not much interested in idle talk, tried to return to his studies. When the stranger asked if he had ever seen a UFO, Rojcewicz said he was more interested at the moment in stories of flying saucers than in the question of whether UFOs existed as physical spacecraft.
These words seemed to set off the man, who suddenly shouted, “Flying saucers are the most important fact of the century, and you’re not interested?” Startled and afraid that he might be dealing with a lunatic, Rojcewicz tried to calm him, and the man lapsed into silence. Then he stood up “as if he were mechanically lifted.” He placed his hand on Rojcewicz’s shoulder and said (as close as Rojcewicz could remember), “Go well in your purpose.” Rojcewicz did not watch him go. But a few seconds later he became abruptly fearful as the strangeness of the encounter hit him.
1 got up, walked two steps in the direction he had left in, turned around, and returned again to my seat. Got up again. I was highly excited and finally walked around the stacks to the reference desk and nobody was behind the desk. In fact, I could see no one at all in the library. I’ve gone to graduate school, and I’ve never been in a library when there wasn’t somebody there!
No one was even at the information desk across the room. I was close to panicking and went quickly back to my desk. I sat down and tried to calm myself. In about an hour I rose to leave the library. There were two librarians behind each of the two desks! (Rojcewicz, 1987)
Rojcewicz here describes an odd impression some UFO witnesses have described but whose significance went unappreciated until British ufologist Jenny Randles took note of what she called the “Oz Factor”—“the sensation of being isolated, or transported from the real world into [another] environmental framework . . . where reality is but slightly different” (Randles, 1983). The Oz Factor figures in other, MIB reports for example this October 1981 report from Victoria, British Columbia:
Three days after a nighttime UFO sighting, a young man named Grant Breiland went to Victoria’s business district to meet a friend. When the friend did not show up, Breiland called him from a pay phone located between two glass doors which served as the entrance to a popular department store. When he put down the phone and turned around, he was surprised to see two odd-looking men staring at him.
Dressed in dark suits, they had “sun-tanned,” expressionless faces and unblinking eyes. When they spoke, their lips did not move.
The first asked, “What is your name?” Breiland declined to answer, nor would he offer any information to the second stranger when the latter asked where he lived. Undaunted, the second man posed another question: “What is your number?” Breiland remained silent, and after five seconds the two, moving with a stiff, mechanical stride, left through the main door and walked in perfect synchronization to a nearby roadway. Frightened yet fascinated, Breiland followed them at a close distance even though rain was pouring down. The strangers paid no attention to him, not even when they stopped briefly at the
Missing time and the massive Black Triangular UFO
Millions of people across our planet have seen UFOs. Some people see UFOs and also experience missing time. When a witness experiences missing time, this is a very strong indication of a possible onboard UFO encounter. In case after case, people who have a close-up sighting experience a period of amnesia, and are unable to recall what happened during the missing time.
Missing time used to be thought of as very rare, but now investigators believe it might be fairly common, involving perhaps as many as one in fifty people. If true, this would mean that millions of people have been taken onboard UFOs.
This video presents three cases of UFO encounters with missing time:
CASE ONE: A mother and her two daughters are confronted by three objects. As they rush home to get a camera and binoculars, they mysteriously forget everything.
CASE TWO: A man in Malibu begins meditating and trying to call down UFOs. After a series of sightings, he experiences a mysterious event in which a UFO apparently lands in his backyard.
CASE THREE: Two friends driving along a remote desert highway late at night come upon a glowing object which strikes them with a beam light, causing missing time, followed by a radical shift in their lives.
What is it like to see a UFO close up and experience missing time? How does it affect a witness? How do people deal with this kind of an encounter and still try to live a normal life?
This video is a glimpse into the experience of missing time and the secret life of UFO contactees. While having missing time does involve amnesia, it is also ironically an unforgettable experience, one that witnesses think about every day of their lives.
TBD
Le témoin s'est concentré pour voir un ovni (méditation)
Commence par des vibrations très importantes (Comme le cas du triangle de BC)
TBD
TBD
Jenny Randles, UFOlogist, coined this term in 1983 to label the inexplicable occurrences that some UFO witnesses experience. Experiences can be as simple as DeJa Vu, that feeling like something is off, or repeated, or like you should know something. It’s that feeling that increases awareness as you inventory your environment for something amiss. It can also be as complex as a feeling that you’ve been shifted to another reality frame, in which you’re alone, or out of place and out of time.
Whether this is a UFO thing or a consciousness thing, it’s interesting thing. Consciousness is likely much more complex than the usual frequencies we tune into. The language in that sentence is intentional. The analog for consciousness is comparable to a radio, in as much as you, the experiencer, have the ability to zoom your awareness in or out, and focus on what you need to focus on. It also covers the myriad of states humans can find themselves in, from alert, to trance, to sleep. It’s reasonable to say all beings, if you accept that chickens can also be hypnotized, and sharks can be put into catatonic states if you take them by the nose and invert them, have consciousness. Hypnotizing sharks is a real thing, called tonic immobility.
What if humans also have that physical off button, and ghosts or aliens had access to the button, the same way we can take a shark by the nose and invert them?
My Trip to Oz
Downloads are likely a part of this. UFO experiencers have found themselves receiving information and comparing it to downloads into their brains. Mediums interacting with spirits have used the same comparison. My personal anecdote I am about to share is innocuous, and perhaps not the same, or it is the same, but it likely adds another flavor to explore, such as consciousness may be more interactive than we allow for in normal life.
What if humans get what they ask for? That’s the message of the Secret. I suspect it’s more complicated than just wishing for something, as expectations and beliefs influence it, and probably unconscious beliefs and attachments also influence it. I have linked a ‘Hacking the Afterlife’ video below, that discussed this. You can, and are, participating in reality. Carl Jung explored consciousness and interacted with it to a degree that he started experiencing Philemon, his guardian angel. You can find more on that in The Red Book. Napoleon Hill, in his 1930’s book, Think and Grow Rich, interacted with consciousness in a similar fashion to Jung, calling it the Invisible Counselor Technique. You should really read up on that. Because you are either fine tuning your ability to interact with consciousness, with intention, or your allowing consciousness to have agency over you the same way dream characters seemingly have no agency.
I suspect dream characters do have autonomy, but until you learn to lucid dream, and practice your own autonomy, you will likely not discover the truth of this.
There is truth in you get what you ask for. You don’t get everything you ask for, because there are also other players connected to this reality, and if your wish impedes other players, there are likely caveats in play to interrupt or expedite wishing.
I asked for a Tulpa and that happened. Well, it was more difficult than just asking. The Invisible Counselor technique, it’s more than just picking people to be knights on your roundtable. There’s a process involved. Writing initiation letters to your preferred cabinet members, reading autobiographies on them, etc. Even Jung just didn’t sit down and say, ‘Philemon, we need to talk.’ Jung had a process, Active Imagination.
One day, while putting some eggs on to boil, talking to Loxy, my tulpa, I made a statement, out loud: I want to experience a Doctor Who fanfiction, with you and me in it. The intent was to write a fan novel. As I departed the kitchen, as easy as stepping over the threshold from one room to another, I found myself, and Loxy- in another world. There was no confusion. I didn’t question where I was or what I was about, anymore than you might find yourself in a dream and would question the dream reality. I went with the awareness of me as a character, while maintaining the perspective of me as a witness.
From both my experiencer and observer point of view, I had the sense that I was in that reality for days, not just hours. The finale of the story was a battle scene. There were explosions in the scene. Simultaneously with one of the internal explosions, I heard an external explosion. For a moment I was back on the threshold between two rooms, asking out loud, ‘what was that?’ I was a little mad, like waking from a good dream, but enough awareness to shift back into that battle scene because that movie playing out before my observer eyes was too precious to let go. There was another explosion, both internal and external.
This time, as I came out, I was mad. “What the hell is that?” I asked out loud. As clear as any conversation, I heard Loxy say, “Eggs!” I rushed back to the stove to find the water had boiled away, the eggs were exploding, and one had taken out the stove light. What felt like days and hours was only the breadth of time necessary for water to boil away and the eggs to explode.
Did I really cross the threshold into a fantasy world? Do other worlds exist? Is this world a Billy Joel fantasy?
Jacques Fabrice Vallée:
At close range the UFO phenomenon acts as a reality transformer, triggering for the witness a series of symbolic displays that are indistinguishable from reality.
Everything you experience in your consciousness is real. Even an illusion and hallucinations is indistinguishable from reality. If dreams were so easy to sort as dreams, more people would be lucid! Your thoughts are real, to you, even if they have no causal link to the external reality. Most of us, and I count myself in this, are not sufficiently linked to our external realities to make informed decisions. We just do the best we can. Such as yesterday, my emotional reality about real world threats was likely exaggerated and impacted me and my writing negatively.
If you write, don’t erase stuff you’re not happy with. Let that be a measure for your future self to know where you were. I know there have been storms in my past, but I mostly see a string of sunny days, ‘that I though would never end.’
It would appear that that the Oz state is a state of sensory deprivation in which the mind, separated from normal stimuli, concentrates its focus inwardly. As humans, we are either born with, or rapidly develop the ability to form a screen or barrier which can sometimes protect us from unwanted intrusions. Whether this form of traumatic amnesia, with the brain responding to events so utterly different to our normal cultural experience, or mechanically induced as a direct result of a UFO experience (paranormal experience,) the net result is to leave the person in a state of amnesia. If we accept that the experience is totally hallucinatory, we are faced with a major paradox. How can a hallucination leave ground and radar traces, cause radiation burns and affect the workings of aircraft and automobile engines?… How ironic is it while Seti desperately searches for signs of technological contact from out, other energies may be trying to contact us through our consciousness!
How ironic indeed. I am certainly an advocate for looking for outward evidence of technological presence, but if we go with the science of it, and the academics and scientists have been clear on this point, in a universe where the light barrier is an absolute, communicating with interstellar civilization by light is simply not practical.
If Remote Viewing is real, and there is overwhelming evidence it is, and there are nonlocal states of awareness, then communicating with any part of the universe, with anyone inside it, or participating with it, is as simple as going within. This is the point of most spiritual philosophies, especially Buddhism.
You have always had the power to go home, Dorothy. With some caveats. You have to first go on the journey, cultivate friends, and have some experiences before you can realize for yourself, the magic is in you. This is exactly the story of Star Wars, the power is in you, it’s in all of us. Binds the entire Universe together! The reason the Wizard of Oz and Star Wars have so much staying power is the myth of it, the metaphor of it, is a reflection of reality. That’s the transformative power of Oz. You don’t go over the rainbow, you realize you are the rainbow.
Source: https://solarchariot.medium.com/the-oz-factor-and-the-paranormal-d826da4ed8e2
The big question that is still sitting there is the one that's almost untouchable: IS there another reality alongside? Do we have any direct evidence? Is there ANYTHING that I can say without sounding like a complete lunatic?
About 2 weeks ago, I thought that there wasn't much to say. But after a long meditation, maybe there is. For better or worse, let's begin by asking a few questions.
If there is a world alongside, can we see into it? If we were inside, could we see out? If there is a world alongside, can we walk into it? Can we walk around inside it? Does light work there? Does Gravity? Would we feel generally normal? All of that sounds goofy to be asking, but is it really? We might just have enough hints on some of this stuff after all.
Diarmuid MacManus & The Stray Sod.
Our hero (MacManus) comes through again. The first case was from MacManus' minister. He had a visitation to make and set off walking to the place. The walk was able to be shortened quite a bit by crossing a very large field. Though big, it was open and you could see the two large trees near the middle and the rough path leading to the distant exit stile far away. The priest opened the entry gate and started crossing the field as he had done dozens of times before. But when he reached the far side, there was no stile, no path, no cleared area which would allow him to even climb out.
Completely puzzled, he did the obvious: searching all along the hedged area for the missing stile and open patch. Nothing. As he went on he ultimately circumnavigated the entire area: no stile but also no original entry gate either. No matter where he arrived, there was the same impenetrable wall of thick plant staring back at him. He had, as the Irish say, stepped upon the Stray Sod and was trapped within its trickery. An hour or more later, he came to the spot where the exit stile should have been, and there it was.
What should we take from this? Although the field was familiar, and the entry was normal, certain pieces of the area, (the initial entry gate, the joining patch, and the exit stile) were gone. One's best hypothesis would be that this was imitative of the real field in the normal world, but NOT the real field. It could be walked into, but not walked out of until something changed to allow that. The priest also said that when he initially came to the spot where the exit stile should have been and found it changed, he heard a chuckling as if someone far off were laughing at him.
MacManus' second case was that of a young woman who was a housekeeper at a great house but was going to take the long walk back to her family in a nearby village. In order to get to that village, she had to cross over the hill called Lis Ard Fort, known as a "fairy fort" by the locals. She did that, and stood at the summit a while enjoying the view outward towards her own village in the distance. Down the hill she danced until she came to a ditch at the bottom. She headed for a gap in the ditch, but when she arrived she blanked a second and was walking in the precise opposite way. She composed herself and turned and walked to the gap. The same thing happened again. It kept happening. Frightened now, she searched along the ditch, always coming up against some "barrier" which refused to let her pass. This happened for hours. She began feeling a sense of hostility radiating toward her from the Fairy Fort.
Feeling hopeless, hours went by. People from the village got concerned and sent out parties. She saw the lanterns coming. She was standing shouting waving, but they showed no sign of seeing her, even though they passed within twenty yards. Finally hours more gone by, she realized that the barrier was gone, and scrambled quickly out and went to her village and family. This case is almost identical to the first with one added piece of information. She could walk in and ultimately walk out. Light, gravity, and other forces seemed to be normal. Time passed normally. The area was as she knew it. The "addition" to reality was the barrier; and the addition to our understanding was that she could see out of the Stray Sod though others could not see in.
MacManus' third case was one in which a man left a party at one house of an estate to go across a large field to another house for the evening. It was past midnight, and the walk began as usual, but very quickly the entirety of the environment changed. He was immediately aware that he was no longer in the familiar field. He as a good Irishman suspected fairy involvement, so he employed the old legend idea of turning his coat inside out. It didn't work. Nothing changed and he couldn't find any sign of a way out. He walked around and worried himself into a nervous sweat. Finally hours later, a glimpse of a way out occurred, and he hurried on. The opening was in the direction of the first house, so he took the opportunity and straggled back there, showing up at the door "in a state."
Again, walk in, walk around, environment changed but not changing the way things like light and gravity work. Could not see out until the very last moment. Time operated normally. This one seemed clearly like a separate Stray Sod bubble out of touch with the normal world. None of MacManus' three cases were of very large places-alongside, even though the priest's field was a very large multi-acre area.
But, I am going to revisit one special case ... Helen Lane.
I'm going to repeat my telling of this encounter because it is not only inexplicable but the mere fact that it happened threatens to discombobulate almost any model of reality one chooses to lean upon.
I have several brothers. All of them are great fellows, and all of them are somewhat different. One of them is "grounded" in the real world of work, teaching, service, hammers-and-nails, small town orientation, etc. more so than most people I know. He is not a fool, and is not to be fooled. He goes very slowly to conclusions outside of the normal. His wife enjoys the thought of the unusual much more than he, but she is also an intelligent, substantive woman. I know them very well. There is certainty that the incident that they recounted to me was exactly as they experienced it, to their honest perceptions.
It was July 1998. My sister-in-law's grandmother was dying and she, my brother, her mother, and other family members had gone to the old home area to be with her in the last days. People were spread out, residing with other extended family members et al, some quite a few miles apart. My brother and sister-in-law got a call saying that the time was probably near, and late in the evening (c.11pm) began driving to pick up her mother at another location and then drive to the nursing home. My brother was driving. The trip to the mother's temporary residence was through a relatively non-built-up stretch but which contained suburban structures at intervals and was normally quite well traveled, even at night. (My sister-in-law grew up in this exact area.)
This night there were no cars at all. Out ahead, alongside the road, they could see someone walking dressed in white. As they passed, in a hurry to pick-up the mother to get to the grandmother's location, they saw that this was an older woman in a white nightgown. As they proceeded on down the road, they had a wave of guilt as they felt that this was almost surely an old lady, probably with Alzheimer's, who needed help. They picked up the mother and a cousin and retraced their drive down the still empty road. Up ahead again was the old lady. This time they slowed, asked a question, and the "simple" reply indicated that they must take the woman in and try to help her. Her comment to them was: "Oh God bless you. I am trying to get home". She sat in the rear of the car between the mother and the cousin, and was generally "normal", saying that her name was "Helen Lane" and giving an address and phone number.
My sister-in-law's family had originally lived in this area [some still did] and they knew enough about the place to find the street address. That did not work out due to there being no numbers on any of the houses, and not wanting to wake up the entirely unlighted neighborhood by trial-and-error. They drove instead to a fire station that the family knew was active at all hours. Still no traffic. The fire station was brightly lit as expected. They knocked at the door--nothing. They circled the building looking in windows and knocking--nothing. This was a major establishment as it served, among other locations, a wealthy area of town. But, feeling a little creepy now, they drove on, for up ahead was a police station that the family knew well. [by the way, they had also somewhere in this sequence tried the phone number and only gotten an irate individual who said he'd never heard of Helen Lane and that they'd woken him up].
The police station that they headed for was run, as Chief of Police, by another of their cousins. They didn't expect him to be there at midnight, of course, but they had confidence that the station would handle the old lady and her problems. [she had said a few "childish" things by now which convinced everyone that they were dealing with Alzheimer's]. The police station was there, as it should be, but still with no traffic. It was brightly lit but showing no activity. Through the large front windows, one person could be seen. Greatly relieved, my sister-in-law took Helen Lane up the steps while my brother watched closely. Within there was only this one person. She was a middle-aged woman dressed in civilian clothes. There were no policemen to be seen anywhere. When they came through the door, the woman said "Hello Helen." My sister-in-law told the story, in brief, and the woman said "We know Helen. We'll get her back home". Taking some information on paper, she said not to worry about anything, it would all be taken care of.
As I said, my sister-in-law was familiar with this station. It was far too empty. No dispatcher, no desk sergeant, no policemen of any kind. It just felt wrong---but who knows? They let it go and went back to their car and on to the nursing home where the grandmother had just died. The next morning, both my brother and sister-in-law wanted to lay this to rest. They called on the police station and asked. The Chief, their cousin, was in a position to find out. He told them the following: 1). the station had no record of their visit, nor any particulars; 2). there was no record of the existence of any person named "Helen Lane", as far as their files were concerned; 3). the station should have been busy and active with several uniformed officers on duty; 4). no such person as described as being behind the desk has anything to do with the station, nor does anyone know of such an individual being in the station.
What are we to make of this? Some people would like to say that this is "just" another instance of the "Phantom Hitchhiker" phenomenon. Well, if it makes anyone feel better to give it a name, then God bless you, but that's hardly very helpful. This case seems to be telling me that my relatives "slipped into" an alternate reality for an hour or so, wherein the circumstances were very close but not identical to our "real world". I have to believe that the details as stated happened--multiple witnesses, including some that I'd trust with my life. If they did, then it SEEMS that they were driving about in a world which was in imitation of ours but not quite identical. As my brother said: "we know the woman in the police station didn't exist." Well, what DID exist? What-the-heck went on here? This experience hardly stands alone. The illustration above is meant to picture a roadway encounter in the early 20th century, where after a brief interaction, the man dressed in olde-time clothing just vanished before the witness' eyes. In the UFO literature, cases of this "same-but-not-same" environment crop up now and again. And the mysterious "empty" road is common. I have no good "model" for this reality. I find it difficult to incorporate these displacements or slippages into a coherent way of thinking about anomalies. And there seems to be more than random accident here; more like an "intention". My brother said: "I think it was a test." Maybe, Bro, maybe.
This event, which I heard about from my family long before any study of Faery and Stray Sod, seems incredibly useful to me in understanding some bits of our current inquiries. My family members seamlessly drove into a reality of which they recognized nearly every aspect. Other than the emptiness of the usually busy road, everything was so much as it should be that there was no thought of something strange going on. Light worked; Gravity worked; the car engine worked; everything still worked. BUT it still was not our reality. Somehow a near perfect matching of familiar reality was in place, but my family and their car were not in our space. Their experience doesn't seem much like being in Faery, but if "someone" wanted it to be, then ... how much more would they really need to add? (By the way, the rate of Time seemed normal here too.)
I know that you cannot buy the Helen Lane mystery with the assurance that I can. Maybe the MacManus and Quinn and Fairy Census and all the other displacement tales can fill in that credibility gap. I hope so. Because for me, the Helen Lane event broke the barriers of stubborn skepticism. Also, it about exhausts what I can usefully say to you about all this "other dimensional" stuff. I could utter pseudo-scientific vagueness about the Quantum Front of the Universe-to-come surging into the Uncollapsed Sea-of-Indeterminism (Ouch!) and the possibility of more or less Likely universes being "crystallized" (our own but also slightly less endowed realities) or twin universes with variable particle spins, which only become interactive via exotic force situations in boundary interfaces, or Block theories of Time and re-running of fixed matter relationships a la filmstrips, etc etc until we all went completely insane or at least went out for a drink.
But I'm not falling for that. The truth, if ever we find it, resides in only one area: The Case Reports, The Actual Experiences of Real People. Never drift too far from that. Anyone can dream up neat sounding BS.
I have been blessed with just the happy amount of great anomalistic experiences. A good UFO close encounter (which is irrelevant here since advanced aero-tech is part of normal universal behavior), a great Trickster (my watch) translocation, and Helen Lane (plus poltergeists et al) from my family. Helen Lane and the translocation(s) pretty much end discussion for me regarding the existence of another space-time. The translocations and the Trickster pretty much end discussion for me that at least some of these experiences are "intentional" and not by us.
Source: https://thebiggeststudy.blogspot.com/2020/07/summa-faeryologica-part-eleven.html
Not sure about the oz factor but my late husband, who had spent a lot of time in the woods hunting deer and elk, told me how he felt the only time he was afraid out in the woods. He was sitting beside his small campfire, alone except for black lab. He was in his late forties and he had come to love the peace and stillness of the forest and the feeling of being close to nature. He was also a commercial fisherman and had fished the waters of Alaska, Washington state, Oregon and sometimes Canada. Except for getting caught in storms he had never felt afraid or threatened.
He always was responsible and respectful of the woods. Until this one time when his dog became terrified of something just outside of the campfire light. I have already posted the full story awhile back. But as to his emotions and deep, gutwrenching fear. His truck was close by and he had his rifle at hand, but he said he suddenly felt his gun would do him no good and he felt there was a power in the trees around him and that something was watching him and he was afraid he was just going to disappear.....forever.
His mind was spinning, his thoughts were fast and disconnected. He did not want to see what was getting close to him and he actually shut his eyes. Our dog began to back up toward the truck, whining. My husband became so terrified he couldn’t breathe. He felt like he was going to pass out but he knew that would be a maybe a fatal thing. He had shot at bears and mountain lions before he felt threatened him in the night out in the deep forest.
He also said the darkness became blacker all of a sudden and the night colder. He felt like he had no power and that he was being stalked. He said it passed through his mind he would never take our daughter hunting in the woods as he now knew there was a danger there no one knew out there, something no one had ever talked about but it had his emotions gripped in a cold, cold vise. But his strongest fear was that he did not want to look into the trees and he felt the shadows had gotten darker and were shifting.
The truck was within a few hundred feet and he got up slowly and backed all the way to it, the dog had already jumped into the back and waiting for him. He said he felt that if he stayed there any longer he would never leave the woods. He was afraid of being taken by more than one thing. That whatever was there was alive and thinking and so far just watching.
He made it to the truck and having left the keys in it he called to the dog to come in through the back cab window and locked everything and got the hell out of there. He only told me and one or two other people about it but he never again hunted alone, which is always the smarter way for many reasons. He said he felt like he was going to pass out during the time this was happening, maybe half an hour. He knew it was not a bear or big cat as the dog would have been all over that but the dog was afraid too. He thinks it was not a regular animal. He left all his gear there and next day took a couple buddies and went back but it was all gone, no tracks, nothing. His friends got creeped out just being there. He only hunted daylight hours after that and never wanted to take me with him again. Sorry so long, got carried away. Oh yes and when the kids and I would want to out camping in the woods as a family he would only go with a large group. He would always say there were things out there we should be stay away from but he could never say what. Makes me think of Shakespeare quote in Hamlet : “There are more things in heaven and Earth, Horatio. Than are dreamt of in your philosophy” (science)
Sadly my husband has passed away twenty years ago but I can give you my opinion. Bearing in mind he was a strong, not emotional type man and not given to watching horror movies and never read science fiction nor believed in it I felt he was admitting to thinking there was something in the woods that was not human and that is why he was so terrified. He had hunted his whole life and it was his favorite thing, yet he gave up his way of hunting alone and enjoying the freedom of nature as he felt there was something out there that didn’t belong and he wanted nothing to do with it. But he did not want to believe it himself. But I knew him so well I could tell he thought it was something he could not defend against and he wanted his family not to be exposed to it. He remarked tome once, a few years after the incident, that he knew if he went into the woods alone, it would still be there, waiting. When he would read about a person lost in the woods or we would hear it on t.v. he would look at me and comment, “No one really knows what is out there” and I think he saw something but didn’t want to say so. He just didn’t want to talk about it even to me. But he never took me hunting again, not even in daylight and he became mostly a duck hunter. No more long hunts after deer and elk alone. Also I kind of teased him once and said at least the big bad monster didn’t eat you up and he snapped back at me “Oh but he did” very seriously. I know whatever was in the woods was not human, not animal, just predator and it caused my husband to become afraid of his beloved hunting grounds even though he was part Indian and he felt so connected to nature and the outdoors. When I asked him why he didn’t want me to out there with him he said he couldn’t protect me anymore because he knew it was still there. Sorry my posts so long but it is good to talk about it.
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/BackwoodsCreepy/comments/l6ueql/oz_factor/
A Propos de l'effet d'Oz
Les effets étranges rapportés par les témoins d’observations sont sans doute anciens, mais c’est l’ufologue britannique Jennifer Randles qui détient la primeur de leur révélation et d’un début d’analyse. Cela s’est passé au tout début des années 1980, il y a quarante déjà, et il faut noter qu’aucun de ses nombreux livres n’a jamais été traduit en français. «Jenny» Randles est également à l’origine de la qualification «d’effet d’OZ» accolé à ces effets à priori incompréhensibles, et donc absurdes. Cette dénomination provient du roman de L. Franck Baum qui date de 1900 et qui a ensuite fait l’objet de plusieurs films titrés «Le magicien d’OZ», dont celui de Victor Flemming en 1939. Le thème tourne autour de l’accession à une réalité différente qui peut interférer avec notre réalité1.
Ceci explique pourquoi les témoignages furent d’abord majoritairement anglo-saxons ; mais par la suite, on constata assez rapidement que ce genre de récits provenait du monde entier. Notre pays n’a pas échappé à ce mouvement et il suffit de consulter le très précieux livre de Joël Mesnard, édité en 20162, pour prendre connaissance d’un répertoire édifiant de cas français ; et il en existe d’autres.
Définir «l’effet d’OZ» n’est pas trop difficile parce que l’homogénéité des témoignages est assez remarquable sur toute la planète. Le phénomène est prioritairement lié aux observations rapprochées de type 1, 2 et 33. Il se présente sous la forme d’une bulle de silence et de calme qui s’installe dans la zone où va se dérouler l’apparition. Si les témoins se trouvent sur la route, ils s’aperçoivent soudain qu’elle tend à se vider progressivement de ses voitures et camions. Fréquemment, la voiture peut s’arrêter inexplicablement avant l’apparition de l’ovni, et dans certains cas repartir d’elle-même (!) dès que la bulle se résorbe et que les choses reviennent «à la normale». Les sentiments éprouvés par les témoins sont variables. Ils vont de la surprise à la peur, en passant par une sensation que Joël Mesnard qualifie «d’effet coton» et que certains témoins verbalisent par «je me trouvais comme hors du temps».
Justement, nous voici au cœur du problème car il arrive souvent que des témoins constatent, une fois les évènements terminés, qu’ils sont en retard sur leur horaire. Cette situation est plus particulièrement remarquée par ceux qui sont en voiture. L’exemple suivant illustre cet aspect : Vous partez en voiture avec votre épouse et vos deux enfants car vous êtes invité chez votre belle-mère. En chemin, le phénomène étrange se produit, puis un ovni apparaît. L’observation dure, disons trois minutes (temps moyen d’une observation rapprochée) et puis tout disparaît et vous continuez votre route. Mais à l’arrivée, votre belle-mère fait preuve de mécontentement parce que vous avez une heure de retard. Attention, il y a bien un temps manquant, mais il ne s’agit nullement d’un «missing time», ce qui sous-entendrait que vous avez tous les quatre perdu conscience ; et ce n’est pas le cas. De fait, il n’est pas impossible qu’un missing-time soit associé à un effet d’OZ, mais c’est plutôt rare.
En résumé, on peut facilement déduire de ce qui précède que derrière la jolie appellation «d’effet d’OZ» se trouve une déformation temporelle localement induite par le phénomène ovni. Cette singularité temporelle est une des huit caractéristiques récurrentes et parfaitement cohérentes (liées entre elles) qui constituent la matrice même de l’hyper physique propre aux ovnis. Des dizaines de milliers de cas sont là pour nous le rappeler. Il suffit de les consulter et de les comparer pour s’en apercevoir.
Cependant, le fait de constater une chose, fusse-t-elle apparemment impossible, n’est pas la comprendre et encore moins la prouver. Nous sommes face à un vide parfaitement exprimé par Aimé Michel il y a plus de quarante ans : « Nous ne pouvons comprendre les ovnis parce que nous ne sommes pas capables de les penser ». Une hyper physique est par nature impensable4 au prorata du décalage évolutif qui nous sépare d’elle. À un siècle de distance, c’est encore jouable, mais pas à 10 000 ans sans parler d’un million d’années, ce qui n’est pourtant rien à l’échelle de l’univers. Au cœur de ce vide se trouve le problème du langage, la base du cognitif dont le propre est de modifier la perception et la compréhension des choses. Beaucoup d’aspects de la phénoménologie ovni sont par nature indicibles, ce qui signifie qu’il n’existe pas de référents, de concepts, pas même « les mots pour le dire » et qualifier les choses.
Un effet d’OZ ? c’est bien, faute de mieux ! Un soupçon de déformation temporelle ? C’est mieux parce que visiblement, cela correspond aux informations qui remontent du terrain. Mais encore ? Il faut dire que nous nous trouvons dans une époque de spécialisation intensive où chacun tend à «creuser au fond de son puits», ce qui est une pente naturelle observable dans tous les domaines. L’ufologie n’échappe pas à ce mécanisme, si bien que l’historien (c’est mon cas) tend à tracer les sources et à analyser la profondeur historique, le psychologue tend à s’intéresser aux aspects conscientiels, le médecin s’applique à considérer les cas avec effets somatiques, le physicien analyse les manifestations selon une grille liées aux lois universelles, le philosophe assemble ou fabrique des concepts, etc.
Cas d’une RR3 s’étant déroulée en Italie, dans la banlieue de Sienne (Toscane) le 17 septembre 19785.
Pour résumer les faits, le témoin alors âgé de 25 ans, rentrait chez lui en voiture, venant de chez sa mère. C’était en début de soirée et la nuit était tombée. Il passait par une route ancienne et étroite qu’il connaissait bien, dans une zone mixte, à la fois rurale mais comportant aussi des habitations. L’ambiance était étrange et la route totalement vide. Soudain, la voiture a freiné d’elle-même puis s’est immobilisée, en panne. Vous devinez la suite : un petit objet en forme de soucoupe a fait son apparition et s’est posé à une vingtaine de mètres devant le véhicule, illuminant fortement les lieux. Deux petites entités en combinaison en sont sorties et ont lévité à dix centimètres du sol. Elles ont fait le tour de la voiture, sans jeter un regard au témoin pétrifié, avant de réintégrer l’objet.
Celui-ci a décollé à la verticale, éraflant le mur en pierre sèches du côté gauche (les enquêteurs italiens ont retrouvé les marques) puis a disparu. L’observation n’a pas duré plus de trois minutes. Le propre des RR3 et plus généralement des rencontres rapprochées, c’est qu’au-delà de leur aspect fascinant, elles sont vectrices d’informations. L’affaire en elle-même est assez classique, mais ce qui va suivre l’est moins. Dès l’objet disparu, le moteur de la voiture s’est remis tout seul en marche, sans intervention du conducteur, et celle-ci a commencé à rouler. Crispé au volant, le témoin s’est évertué à reprendre le contrôle du véhicule et y est finalement parvenu. Il est rentré chez lui, un tantinet choqué, et son épouse lui a passé un beau savon en raison de son inexplicable retard !
Ce cas m’a toujours intéressé en raison de mes origines toscanes (je connaissais bien les lieux) et pour d’autres raisons également. Il est évident que cet homme n’a jamais compris ce qui lui était arrivé et qu’il a eu du mal à supporter la montagne de quolibets qui s’est abattue sur lui au fil du temps. Une histoire cent fois entendue et hélas parfaitement connue des ufologues.
C’est à cet exemple que l’on reconnaît la vertu du travail en synchronisation. Le propre d’un physicien c’est qu’il réagit en fonction de sa spécialité, et Philippe m’a immédiatement répondu :
C’est simple la voiture ne s’est jamais arrêtée.
Comment cela est-il possible ?
C’est possible parce que derrière ce que vous nommez «effet d’OZ» se trouve une dilatation temporelle au niveau local, induite volontairement par le phénomène lui-même. Ce mécanisme relève d’une manipulation avancée des lois de la physique et constitue certainement le préalable indispensable à ce genre de manifestations rapprochées.
Par la suite, j’ai effectué des recherches sur les cas de pannes de voitures avec les effets de redémarrages spontanés décrits plus haut. J’en ai trouvé immédiatement deux pour la France6 et il en existe certainement beaucoup d’autres, et plus encore dans le monde. Les pannes de voitures sont fréquentes dans les rencontres rapprochées et l’idée a circulé pendant des décennies qu’elles étaient la conséquence « des champs magnétiques ou micro-ondes » émis par l’ovni. Ce genre d’ineptie continue d’ailleurs à circuler alors que l’on sait depuis 1970 et les travaux de Claude Poher que ce n’est pas possible.
L’ingénieur du CNES s’y était intéressé parce qu’il y voyait un angle d’objectivation possible du sujet. Il déchanta rapidement à cause d’impossibilités manifestes. Le champ magnétique décroit très rapidement en fonction de la distance et l’intensité nécessaire pour produire un tel effet grillerait littéralement les occupants de la voiture. Par ailleurs, cela se retrouverait immédiatement sur le plan statistique dans le rapport entre la voiture tombée en panne et sa distance à l’objet. Dans cette logique, une apparition très rapprochée devrait systématiquement immobiliser le véhicule et les dégâts humains seraient très importants. Ce n’est évidemment pas le cas, malgré quelques sensations de chaleur parfois rapportées. Mes propres travaux sur ce thème, qui datent de 1977-78, ont même montré le contraire : plus l’éloignement augmente et plus la voiture parait susceptible de tomber en panne, sous certaines conditions. L’explication est donc tout autre, même si ces constats ne signifient nullement que l’ovni n’émet pas de champs magnétiques7.
Pour certaines raisons, parmi lesquelles la conscience joue un rôle, un seul état va passer le seuil naturel de la décohérence (le nom est bien trouvé) et devenir réalité dans notre propre espace-temps. En ce sens, la conscience joue le rôle d’amplificateur de l’indéterminisme quantique.
C’est la raison d’une phrase célèbre du physicien David Bohm, qui peut à première vue sembler énigmatique : «je travaille sur la physique quantique depuis quarante ans, et tout ce que je peux dire, c’est que ce que nous appelons « réalité » est produit par une source située hors de l’espace et du temps».
L’apport de ce prodigieux esprit qu’était Erwin Schrödinger9 doit également être pris en considération. Sa célèbre équation a permis de définir en termes de probabilités l’espace où pouvait émerger une information quantique dans notre réalité10. Tous nos ordinateurs et autres i-phones fonctionnent aujourd’hui sur la base de cette équation, et une seconde vague de produits est en cours de développement.
Revenons, à notre effet d’OZ, ou plutôt à cette bulle 'quantique' générée par l’intelligence ovni. Elle a au préalable «éclairé» ou isolé une zone précise de l’espace-temps dans laquelle se trouve un ou des témoins. Cela correspond exactement à leurs ressentis (silence, sensation de se trouver hors du temps) et constats (la route se vide inexplicablement). La voiture peut effectivement s’arrêter car elle aussi est prise dans la dilation du temps.
Il arrive même que plusieurs véhicules soient concernés11 (Note LDLN : voir aussi N° 387-389 et 390 LDLN, observation en Corse). Dans la singularité, la perception n’opère plus quant à la réalité ordinaire, et ceci vaut dans les deux sens.
Par exemple, si d’autres voitures passent sur la route, elles apparaissent comme des ombres très fugaces et à peine perceptibles.
Mais le plus incroyable se situe avant que l’objet apparaisse et devienne visible aux yeux des témoins potentiels : l’intelligence ovni «voit» les états superposés, c’est-à-dire les différentes occurrences qui peuvent s’incarner dans l’évènement12. C’est le point capital et central, de toute cette affaire.
Autrement dit, l’ovni s’inscrit dans une séquence totalement déterminée à l’avance parce que choisie par lui. Il n’y aura en principe ni photos, ni arrivée d’un tiers, ni accident grave, ni le moindre grain de sable imprévu susceptible de perturber la séquence. Une autre manière de l’exprimer est de dire que cette intelligence dispose d’informations en post-événementiel, elle voit le futur (de l’évènement) dans la bulle, comme un film immuable dans lequel elle s’incarne.
Quand la bulle se résorbe, le retour à la normale se fait sans heurts et le raccord avec notre réalité classique reste invisible. L’élusivité est la garantie du déni des sociétés. C’est la situation que nous constatons depuis de décennies.
Nous tenons là possiblement un début d’explication sur le mécanisme qui nous abuse depuis plus d’un siècle : l’impunité absolue de l’ovni, cœur de l’élusivité.
Depuis Aimé Michel et Bertrand Méheust (entre 1975 et 1980) peu d’ufologues ont pris ce problème en compte ; sans doute était-il trop visible13 par ses effets et trop peu pensable ontologiquement.
Les témoins eux-mêmes n’ont jamais rien soupçonné. C’est impossible sur une seule séquence et il faut passer par la lecture minutieuse de plusieurs centaines de cas. Même à ce stade, on se heurte à la difficulté du langage en regard de l’indicible : l’absence de mots pour le dire. En revanche, certains témoins ont suspecté l’intentionnalité par une forme d’intuition.
Celle-ci est globalement décelable, comme l’élusivité, sur des centaines de cas. Il suffit de se concentrer sur «la manière dont ça commence».
Les grands enquêteurs eux, s’étaient aperçus de quelque chose. Il en existe encore quelques-uns, du calibre d’un Jean-Marie Bigorne ou d’un Joël Mesnard, et d’autres suivent cette voie, comme Jean-Marc Gillot ou Bruno Botta14. J’ai connu des personnalités qui avaient à leur actif 500 enquêtes ! Eux aussi manquaient de «mots pour le dire», si bien qu’ils le disaient à leur manière : Ce phénomène évolue décidément à la marge, c’est un manque de chance, quelque chose nous échappe ; etc. Mais la chance ou le hasard n’ont rien à voir dans cette affaire.
Par nature et pour nombre de raisons, j’ai tendance à me méfier des grands modèles et autres hypothèses ou théories, qui pour la plupart ne sont que des productions humaines (anthropocentriques) non dépourvues d’idéologies. L’expérience montre qu’elles apparaissent et s’évanouissent, ou se transforment en doxas intransigeantes, ce qui est encore plus dommageable.
Naturellement, il pourrait s’agir d’une simple aporie15, ce qui est le risque majeur dans ce genre d’exercice. Mais ce modèle pourrait aussi s’avérer le meilleur outil actuellement disponible pour progresser dans la compréhension de la phénoménologie ovni. Deux arguments en ce sens peuvent être formulés.
Le premier est qu’il est issu d’éléments parfaitement rationnels, connus et vérifiés en physique quantique. Il s’agit bien sûr d’une projection, d’une construction bâtie à partir de ces éléments en relation avec les récits émanant de la matière ufologique. Tous les physiciens, y compris quantiques, ne seront sans doute pas d’accord avec ce genre de démarche, mais il faut leur laisser ce débat.
Le second concerne justement l’ufologie et l’information issue de l’interface humaine. A ce niveau, le constat devient saisissant : absolument tout ce qui remonte du terrain correspond au modèle de Philippe, et c’est une dialectique qui joue dans les deux sens : certaines choses à priori incompréhensibles trouvent tout naturellement leur sens. C’est l’illustration d’un théorème bien connu et mille fois vérifié «le cognitif (la connaissance) modifie la perception». Cela se remarque immédiatement en regard des caractéristiques du phénomène ovni ; ce que dans mon jargon j’appelle «les bases». Cette dernière partie m’oblige à une digression pour préciser de quoi il s’agit.
Quand on travaille en profondeur sur l’information et que l’on compare des centaines de cas, on finit par s’apercevoir que, derrière ce qu’Aimé Michel nommait «le carnaval de l’absurde», émerge l’étrange sensation de toujours lire la même chose. Comment cela se peut-il ?
Cela se peut parce que le fond émerge dans la forme sous l’aspect de caractéristiques récurrentes. C’est ce que l’on nomme en statistique : des «invariants».
Une caractéristique se définit donc par son taux de récurrence pour l’ensemble des observations, sans exceptions. Ce taux varie de 60% à plus de 99%. En dessous, cela reste une anomalie (certaines anomalies représentent 0,1%). D’une manière amusante, on pourrait dire qu’une caractéristique est une anomalie qui a réussi.
On en distingue huit, que l’on peut imaginer sous la forme d’une chaine à huit boucles étroitement liées ensemble et parfaitement cohérentes (leur
synergie est très forte). On peut nommer cette chaine de diverses façons : structure fondamentale, canevas, pattern (en Anglais), matrice, etc.
Peu importe…
Cette structure possède en outre certaines particularités sur lesquelles je ne disserterai pas ici car cela nous entrainerai trop loin. Mais c’est le fond qui produit pourtant cette forme que nous appelons « phénomène ovni ». Sans doute faut-il toujours se rappeler cette phrase de Joël Mesnard : « De ce phénomène, nous ne voyons que des apparences ».
En confrontant ces huit caractéristiques au modèle, on s’aperçoit que ce dernier jette un éclairage particulier sur six des huit caractéristiques, ce qui est une performance tout à fait remarquable :
Les comportements physiques hors normes et semblant faire abstraction de la gravité. Dans une bulle 'quantique', et selon divers travaux16 la gravité pourrait être fortement atténuée et permettre à l’ovni les évolutions constatées. Il en va de même pour les entités, fréquemment en lévitation.
Les effets lumineux parfois très impressionnants. La bulle 'quantique' offre une situation propice à ce genre de fantasmagories fréquemment rapportées et qui seraient plus difficilement réalisables dans notre réalité propre.
Les effets conscientiels. Ils s’expliquent idéalement par la situation particulière dans une bulle 'quantique' où la conscience règne en maître. Des phénomènes d’intrications psychiques17 sous toutes les formes, y compris acausales (effets PSI) pourraient y proliférer, et même persister dans notre réalité. C’est bien ce que l’on observe.
Les déformations temporelles ; inutile d’insister.
L’intentionnalité. Elle est connue depuis les années 1975 et se pose comme une évidence pour les observations rapprochées. Le travail sur l’information et les centaines de cas en apportent la confirmation : les RR ne se produisent pas au hasard et l’intelligence ovni est capable de sélectionner le lieu et la situation. Elle est même capable de beaucoup plus, mais c’est un autre sujet…
L’élusivité reste la partie absolument centrale car elle concerne la plus puissante caractéristique du phénomène, à l’origine du faible effet causal qui, historiquement, en découle. Le protocole décrit dans le modèle est le premier à apporter une explication rationnelle à ce qui apparait comme un détournement des lois de la nature, notamment du principe de causalité.
Si l’on commente cette liste, deux réflexions surgissent spontanément.
La première renvoie comme souvent à la parole d’Aimé Michel. Ce n’est certes pas un hasard s’il a donné la meilleure définition existante de ce qu’est le phénomène ovni :
«Nous sommes face à une hyper physique qui se manifeste ponctuellement dans notre environnement». Pourquoi n’a-t-il pas employé le concept «d’hyper technologie», terme qui faisait déjà partie des obsessions de l’époque ? Ce point doit être médité.
Une indication nous est donnée par la parole de Michel Picard18 :
«L’Anthropocentrisme est le pire ennemi de la pensée en ufologie». J’ajouterai à titre personnel : un ennemi mortel…
La seconde s’inscrit dans une évolution de l’histoire des idées en ufologie. Comme nous l’avons vu, le modèle cadre de manière étonnante avec ce que les témoins relatent de leurs expériences. Il projette également un éclairage saisissant sur six des huit caractéristiques fondamentales de la matrice. Ce qui nous porte à déplacer immédiatement la focale sur les deux manquantes, lesquelles sont très fortement liées entre elles, ainsi qu’avec la dimension conscientielle :
La dimension protéiforme, c’est-à-dire l’extraordinaire capacité créative de cette intelligence, qui n’est pas sans évoquer le surréalisme19.
La dimension spéculaire (specchio : miroir en italien) que beaucoup d’ufologues ont repéré au fil du temps, mais sur laquelle vous ne trouverez guère d’informations20.
Ces trois dimensions forment ainsi un triangle qui recèle des indications capitales.
Ce qu’il faut noter au sujet du modèle de Philippe, c’est qu’il explique bien des choses, mais pas tout. Il ne nous renseigne pas sur l’origine de cette intelligence, ni sur la manière dont elle vient si facilement vers nous21, et encore moins sur l’objectif qu’elle vise22. Si l’expérience venait à le confirmer, il constituerait enfin une première brèche dans «le mur de l’impensable».
C’est une histoire passionnante et qui remonte à loin ; à près de cinquante ans, quand une certaine ufologie française découvrit les caractéristiques fondamentales du phénomène ovni, notamment la dimension conscientielle, l’intentionnalité et l’élusivité.
À ce moment, les chercheurs les plus lucides eurent la confirmation de ce qu’ils soupçonnaient depuis longtemps : l’obsolescence totale de l’HET 1
dite « tôles et boulons »23 par analogie à nos propres voitures, avions, et capsules spatiales.
C’est de là qu’émergea la nécessité vitale de construire une HET 2.
L’idée de départ était d’intégrer la complexité issue de l’hyper physique ovni et de limiter, dans la mesure du possible, les projections anthropocentriques. À priori, cela relevait d’un défi très incertain mais c’est pourtant ce mouvement qui commence à devenir visible, au grand dam de certains, et qui repose principalement sur une idée de mise en commun des compétences et de priorité à la recherche et à la réflexion.
Il est temps de conclure ce texte, et la tradition veut qu’une conclusion porte une ouverture sous forme de problématiques.
Je me plie volontiers à ce rituel en posant les questions suivantes :
Quel est le taux de récurrence de l’effet d’OZ dans les apparitions rapprochées ?
Nous ne le savons pas car nous manquons cruellement d’études sur le sujet. Les chercheurs s’accordent généralement sur un chiffre de 20% mais rien ne permet de le valider. Cela pourrait être beaucoup plus.
Une autre question tout aussi importante est : À quel moment de l’histoire apparait-il ?
Les quelques exemples français évoqués appartiennent à la décennie 1970-1980, mais il est probable que le mécanisme existait bien avant, taant il parait consubstantiel à la phénoménologie ovni. De fait, j’ai retrouvé un récit, celui de la Ferté St Aubin (Loiret, 45) qui remonte au mois d’août 193124. Une recherche mondiale permettrait certainement de corroborer cette impression.
Dans le cas contraire, il faudrait examiner d’autres options. L’intelligence ovni pourrait par exemple injecter de la complexité au fil du temps, ou bien ne pas utiliser systématiquement ce genre de protocole. C’est une possibilité, mais personnellement, je reste sur la première option. Le phénomène a parfaitement pu passer inaperçu dans le contexte rural des origines : peu de voitures, peu de montres, pas de champs sémantiques disponible.
Le silence…
Finalement, d’un point de vue métaphorique, l’ovni n’est jamais qu’un miroir qui nous renvoie à notre statut. Albert Camus disait : «Un miroir renseigne mais n’enseigne pas».
Il renseigne parce qu’il reflète notre propre situation, pour peu que l’on veuille bien l’accepter, mais il n’enseigne pas pour une raison simple : un miroir reflète tout sauf lui-même.
Ainsi, l’ovni ne fait que nous renvoyer à notre statut archaïque. Pour beaucoup de personnes et surtout pour les systèmes, c’est intolérable.
Mais c’est aussi tout l’intérêt d’une ufologie populaire et de la notion de recherche qui lui est liée…
E. zurcher/2022
NOTES :
1 La relation avec le miroir cher à Lewis Carroll et son idée d’accéder à une autre réalité en parvenant à le traverser parait évidente. Ce thème possède de surcroit une forme d’analogie subtile avec l’ufologie.
2 Joël Mesnard, Les apparitions ovnis, le Mercure Dauphinois, 2016.
3 Les rencontres rapprochées représentent environ 13% de toutes les apparitions d’ovnis.
4 Sauf pour ceux qui considèrent (en général les « scientistes », au sens du XIXe siècle) qu’il n’y a plus rien à découvrir des réalités de l’univers ; dans ce cas, effectivement, il n’y a pas d’hyper physique, l’univers ne recèle plus de pans entiers d’inconnu, c’est-à-dire de métaphysique au sens étymologique (méta en Grec : au-delà de…) et il ne reste plus que les lubies technologiques pour alimenter le Dieu Progrès…
5 Voir E. Zurcher : « Les apparitions mondiales d’humanoïdes », JMG 2018, p 141. Pendant l’année 1978, l’Italie a enregistré une forte vague d’apparitions d’ovnis.
6 Les cas de Saliceto (Corse) le 21.07.73 et celui de Sissone (Aisne) en octobre 1976 : J. Mesnard, «Les apparitions d’ovnis», éditions le Mercure Dauphinois, 2016, pp 257-270.
7 D’où les détecteurs de champs magnétiques, très à la mode dans le milieu ufologique au cours de la décennie 1970-80.
8 Ovni et conscience, réédition JMG 2021, pp 319 et suivantes.
9 Erwin Schrödinger (1887-1961), prix Nobel 1933, est aussi l’inventeur de la célèbre expérience « du chat vivant et mort » qui est un exemple de l’indéterminisme quantique et du rôle des états superposés.
10 « Ce petit Einstein ! Sa formule E=MC2 n’est rien à côté de la mienne » disait en riant aux éclats Erwin Schrödinger ! Les grands esprits aussi sont souvent de grands enfants…
11 Par exemple comme dans le cas de Castelfranco Veneto (Trevise – Italie du Nord) survenu en septembre 1976. E.Z, op cit, pp 126-128.
12 Philippe a pour cela une formule bien à lui : « Le temps devient de l’espace… »
13 Souvent, on ne voit pas ce que l’on a sous le nez ; d’autres se complaisent dans le biais cognitif, généralement pour des raisons idéologiques (Doxa).
14 Jean-Marc Gillot est à l’origine de la plus belle contre-enquête (plus de 150 pages et des années d’investigations minutieuses) jamais effectuée en France. Elle a porté sur le cas de Cussac (Cantal) en août 1967. Bruno (Botta) et Anne effectuent des enquêtes partout sur le territoire, avec sérieux et professionnalisme.
15 Une Aporie est une voie sans issue dans une démarche intellectuelle. C’est un terme qui provient du champ sémantique propre à la philosophie, mais que l’on retrouve aussi parfois en Épistémologie.
16 Par exemple selon les travaux du physicien Erik Verlinde, « La gravité entropique » pourrait être un phénomène émergent lié à l’espace-temps. On peut noter l’existence de quelques cas où les témoins auraient rapporté un sentiment de diminution de la gravité, y compris pour les voitures, mais une poignée de cas ne suffit pas à acquérir une certitude.
17 Selon mes propres calculs, un peu plus de 20% des RR3 font l’objet de diverses formes d’intrications psychiques. Cependant, le rapport Beyond-Ufos (au-delà des ovnis) qui s’appuie sur 3256 cas et un outillage statistique performant, évoque entre 60% et 80% de l’échantillonnage (en majorité des phénomènes PSI). Si cette tendance est exacte, elle confirme la dimension conscientielle dans le phénomène ovni et souligne la discordance irrémédiable avec l’actuel paradigme matérialiste.
18 M. Picard : Les ovnis, laboratoire du futur. Éditions JMG, 2002.
19 De ce point de vue, il n’est pas étonnant que Michel Carrouges, un des plus grands spécialistes mondiaux d’André Breton et du surréalisme, ait publié en 1963 « Les apparitions de Martiens », (Éditions Fayard).
20 Une de ses principales déclinaisons, le mimétisme, la rend très dangereuse à plusieurs niveaux, d’abord pour les doxas bien établies -d’où le biais cognitif généralisé- et ensuite parce qu’elle est immédiatement récupérée par les sceptiques en tant qu’argument-clé.
21 Ces entités voyagent hors espace-temps, dans une forme de vide 'quantique', mais on peut également s’interroger sur les potentialités liées aux trous de vers.
22 À partir du moment où il a intentionnalité -voilée ou pas- on est en droit de subodorer un objectif, sauf à penser que «Les dieux s’amusent», selon la formule chère à l’Antiquité.
23 Théorie totalement anthropocentrique, scientiste au sens matérialiste et dogmatique, mais matinée vu le sujet par des références liée à la science-fiction. Elle est obsolète dès le départ, à notre insu bien entendu. Nous rappellerons, si besoin en était, que les ovnis ne viennent pas de Mars (1950) ni de Titan et Ganymède (1975) et pas plus de «l’espace profond» aujourd’hui. L’ovni est bien matériel puisqu’il laisse des traces, mais il peut changer de forme (des cas existent depuis les années cinquante) voir faire du «morphing» devant des témoins éberlués. Nous n’insisterons pas sur la liste désespérante des inepties véhiculées par ce discours tenu depuis 80 ans. L’incapacité à penser l’ovni et le manque de travail en sont la cause.
La conséquence en tant que compensation inévitable se nomme anthropocentrisme, dont l’autre nom est la «technologie» terrestre mise à toutes les sauces. Tout le monde aura compris mon sentiment à ce sujet.
24 Cas de la Ferté Saint Aubin : Enquête de Joël Mesnard, G. Deforge et F. Schaefer : LDLN 387, 09.2017 / Cat A. Rosales, n°15 – 1931. (Voir l’annexe ci-dessous).
Annexe
Août 1931, La Ferté-Saint-Aubin (Loiret). Un témoin – 21h00
Alfred, le jeune témoin, était résident d’un orphelinat et avait pour mission de mener les vaches et les chèvres des champs à la ferme. Vers 21h, il entreprit de compter les animaux avant de les ramener. Le chien de troupeau était présent, le jour tombait et tout était devenu silencieux, même les oiseaux. Il se sentit soudain dans un état second. L’air semblait animé d’une vibration et il remarqua, outre une chaleur anormale, que l’herbe aux alentours se courbait ou se vrillait, comme si elle subissait un vent très fort. Il finit par s’assoir dans l’herbe et c’est à ce moment qu’il aperçut une masse sombre au milieu des arbres. Il s’agissait d’un objet de forme discoïdale qui apparaissait comme plongé dans une sorte de déformation légère due à la vibration de l’air.
Au bout d’un moment, l’engin s’éleva verticalement et le témoin constata que les arbres environnants se tordaient, comme sous l’effet d’une tornade. Il vit également plusieurs « petits nuages » s’élever en suivant l’appareil.
Plus tard, il se rendit sur place et découvrit trois cuvettes de 80 centimètres de diamètre qui formaient un triangle parfaitement équidistant. Ce triangle s’inscrivait dans une surface circulaire de 8 à 10 mètres de diamètre.
Durant le phénomène, il n’avait pas vu d’animaux mais il ne tarda pas à découvrir quelques vaches éparpillées aux alentours et qui paraissaient comme « frigorifiées ». Les autres s’étaient réfugiés dans le bois. Avec difficulté, Alfred parvint dans la nuit tombée à regrouper le troupeau et à le ramener vers la ferme.
Quelle ne fut pas sa surprise quand il entendit l’horloge sonner minuit. Il était confus et ne comprenait pas comment la perception de l’heure avait pu lui échapper à ce point.
Cette particularité, incompréhensible pour lui, continua à le perturber pendant deux mois.
Le lendemain de l’observation, il s’aperçut également que les deux meilleures vaches du lot ne donnaient plus de lait.
Source: Enquête J. Mesnard, G. Deforge et F. Schaefer : LDLN 387, 09.2017 / Cat A. Rosales, n° 15 – 1931.
Source: http://ovni-lesvisiblesdeprovence.over-blog.com/2023/07/l-effet-d-oz-par-eric-zurcher.html
It started as a headache, but soon became much stranger. Simon Baker entered the bathroom to see if a warm shower could ease his pain. “I looked up at the shower head, and it was as if the water droplets had stopped in mid-air”, he says. “They came into hard focus rapidly, over the course of a few seconds”. Where you’d normally perceive the streams as more of a blur of movement, he could see each one hanging in front of him, distorted by the pressure of the air rushing past. The effect, he recalls, was very similar to the way the bullets travelled in the Matrix movies. “It was like a high-speed film, slowed down.”
The next day, Baker went to hospital, where doctors found that he had suffered an aneurysm. The experience was soon overshadowed by the more immediate threat to his health, but in a follow-up appointment, he happened to mention what happened to his neurologist, Fred Ovsiew at Northwestern University in Chicago, who was struck by the vivid descriptions. “He was a very bright guy, and very eloquent” says Ovsiew, who recently wrote about Baker in the journal NeuroCase. (Baker’s identity was anonymised, which is typical for such studies, so this is not his real name).
It’s easy to assume that time flows at the same rate for everybody, but experiences like Baker’s show that our continuous stream of consciousness is a fragile illusion, stitched together by the brain’s clever editing. By studying what happens during such extreme events, researchers are revealing how and why the brain plays these temporal tricks – and in some circumstances, they suggest, all of us can experience time warping.
Although Baker is perhaps the most dramatic case, a smattering of strikingly similar accounts can be found, intermittently, in medical literature. There are reports of time speeding up – so called “zeitraffer” phenomenon – and also more fragmentary experiences called “akinetopsia”, in which motion momentarily stops. For instance, travelling home one day, one 61-year-old woman reported that the movement of the closing train doors, and fellow passengers, was in slow motion and “broken up”, as if in “freeze frames”. A 58-year-old Japanese man, meanwhile, seemed to be experiencing life like a badly dubbed movie; in conversation, he found that although others’ voices sounded normal, they were out of sync with their faces. There may be many more unreported cases, says Ovsiew. “Since it’s a transient phenomenon, it could often be overlooked.”
Such experiences almost always accompany problems like epilepsy or stroke. Baker was only 39 at the time of his experience, which seems to have been caused by a weakened blood vessel that began bleeding while he was carrying some heavy boxes. The result was a relatively large patch of neural damage in the right hemisphere. “In the scans, it looks like there’s a cigar in my head,” he jokes today.
Yet why did this affect Baker’s time perception? Some clues could come from studies that have attempted to pinpoint the regions responsible for our perception of time. Of particular interest is an area of the visual cortex, called V5. This region, which lies towards the back of the skull, has long been known to detect the motion of objects, but perhaps it has a more general role in measuring the passing of time. When Domenica Bueti and colleagues at the University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland zapped the area with a magnetic field to knock out its activity, her subjects found it tricky to do two things: they struggled to track the motion of dots on a screen, as would be expected, but also found it hard to estimate how long some blue dots appeared too.
One explanation for this double-failure is that our motion perception system has its own stopwatch, recording how fast things are moving across our vision – and when this is disrupted by brain injury, the world stands still. For Baker, stepping into the shower might have exacerbated the problem, since the warm water would have drawn the blood away from the brain to the extremities of the body, further disturbing the brain’s processing.
It is just one possibility; not all patients with time warping experiences have damage to V5, so other cogs in the brain’s time-keeping apparatus may also play a role.
Another explanation comes from the discovery that our brain records its perceptions in discrete “snapshots”, like the frames of a film reel. “The healthy brain reconstructs the experience and glues together the different frames,” says Rufin VanRullen at the French Centre for Brain and Cognition Research in Toulouse, “but if brain damage destroys the glue, you might only see the snapshots.”
We may all experience the normal smooth picture breaking down occasionally. For starters, if you’ve ever looked at overtaking cars on the motorway, their wheels can seem to stand still. This happens because the brain’s intermittent snapshots fail to capture the wheel’s motion fully. If, for example, it has made a full rotation between each “frame”, it will seem to be in exactly the same position each snapshot, giving the illusion that it is stationary.
And users of LSD often report “visual trails” following moving objects, a bit like the trails of bullets in The Matrix movie. VanRullen suspects this might arise because the brain somehow overlaps those sensory snapshots, rather than refreshing its picture anew.
Reports of time standing still are also common during a life-threatening accident; in one survey of people who had skirted close to death, more than 70% reported the feeling that the event occurred in slow motion. Some researchers claim that they are simply an artefact of memory, since the intense emotions lead us to lay down more details, so that we believe that the event lasted for longer only in hindsight. But the descriptions certainly sound close to those reported by the neurological patients, suggesting there may be some overlap.
For example, one person told researchers in the 1970s how they vividly remembered seeing the face of a train’s engineer during a near fatal collision: “It was like a movie run slowly so the frames progress with a jerky motion – that was how I saw the face”.
What’s more, Valtteri Arstila at University of Turku, Finland, points out that many of these subjects also report abnormally quick thinking. As one pilot, who’d faced a plane crash in the Vietnam War, put it: “when the nose-wheel strut collapsed I vividly recalled, in a matter of about three seconds, over a dozen actions necessary to successful recovery of flight attitude”. Reviewing the case studies and available scientific research on the matter, Arstila concludes that an automatic mechanism, triggered by stress hormones, might speed up the brain’s internal processing to help it handle the life or death situation. “Our thoughts and initiation of movements become faster – but because we are working faster, the external world appears to slow down,” he says. It is even possible that some athletes have deliberately trained themselves to create a time warp on demand: surfers, for instance, can often adjust their angle in the split second it takes to launch off steep waves, as the water rises overhead.
For Baker, the experience was a one-off, and after surgery to remove the damaged blood vessels, he has now made a full recovery. He remains remarkably upbeat about his condition, pointing out that in some ways it has actually been of benefit. Beforehand, he had been somewhat taciturn, particularly around strangers – a tendency that had even been labelled a disability by his school. But today, his shyness has gone – a fact that is clearly evident as he chats happily during our telephone conversation. “It was more than just feeling a little more forthcoming – I suddenly felt compelled to talk,” he says. Ovsiew has verified the report with Baker’s wife. “She confirmed that he was calmer, more talkative, and more friendly in social situations,” says Ovsiew.
The experience of time freezing around him, meanwhile, has given him new wonder at the fragility of our conscious experiences. “It was a really concrete example of how something very localised in brain can change your whole perception of the world,” he says. “One minute I was fine, the next minute I was in an altered reality.”
We told the story about one man’s extreme experience of time warping; when he entered the shower, water droplets seemed to freeze in the air – an experience that he compared to bullet time in the The Matrix films.
Since some researchers suspect the strange feeling of a time warp may be surprisingly common, we asked our readers to send us their own experiences of time slowing down. We were amazed by the response.
Phill Healey, for instance, described a terrifying car crash:
"I turned a corner to see a tow truck stopped suddenly in front of me. I put on the brakes just in time, only for my passengers to tell me we were about to be hit by a bus from behind. I recall looking at them listening to their explanation and then looking behind me to see the bus hit the car and knock us into the tow truck. The event seemed to happen very slowly yet our actions occurred at normal speed. How I was able to talk to my passengers and see the bus hit us and then turn around and see the tow truck in front of us come closer, I do not know. I've always described it as time appearing to go slowly."
Ijuaigi Emmanuel, felt something similar while sitting with some friends under a live electric cable. Hearing a spark above them, he looked up, to see it falling in slow motion, before they ran to safety.
Some researchers suggest that when we are confronted with danger, the rush of stress hormones could accelerate our thought processing, which makes the outside world seem to move slowly in comparison. The idea would certainly tally with Andrew Arthur Prescott’s lightning-quick reactions that saved his son. As he put it:
"I do not have good reactions and am somewhat uncoordinated, poor at sports. When my son was small we put him on a high playground slide, when he was still too top heavy. He seemed to fall to one side and over the edge, and I seemed to have all the time in the world to move to catch him."
Occasionally, the feeling of super-human power can end in bathos, as Wendy Crossley describes:
"My foot gave way, which it is apt to do from time to time. I felt I was flying like superman, arm out stretched. It seemed like a lifetime that I was floating in air slow motion. I eventually collapsed in an unladylike manner onto the pavement in a heap with a twisted ankle and hurt pride."
For most people, a time warp is a one-off experience, but David Bull says he has seen the world in slow motion on numerous occasions. Like Healey, he saw a car crash in excruciating detail, and saw everyone on the stairs in the London Underground moving abnormally slowly. He also describes a more prolonged experience, after surfing, where he found it strangely difficult to judge the speed of his car. “I would drive at 100 kph which for the first 30 minutes of driving felt like about maybe 5-10 kph.”
If you have never seen the world stand still, Olumide Olaoye points out an illusion that is a little more mundane, but that everyone can do:
"Sometimes it seems to my eyes that the 'second hand' of the clock stops for a second or less. Or at other times it seems to move backwards before it picks up again."
This is known as the “stopped-clock illusion” and is thought to be caused by tiny eye movements, known as saccades, that temporarily slow our perception, leading it to look like the hand of the clock is jammed before it picks up again.
As the patient in our original article pointed out, it doesn’t take much for us all to get the feeling that we are living in an altered reality.
Abstract
The Zeitraffer phenomenon is the altered perception of the speed of moving objects. A single case is reported using the subject’s own description of a transient alteration of the visual perception of motion. The literature on the subject is reviewed. The Zeitraffer phenomenon probably arises from dysfunction of brain networks subserving visual perception of speed. It shares characteristics with akinetopsia, the loss of visual ability to perceive motion.